|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|21-993||La. Ct. App.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2022|
Issues: (1) Whether the presumption of innocence, the right to confrontation and the right to a fair trial permit a court to allow the grand jury prosecutor to take the stand and offer testimony regarding the prosecutor’s belief about the credibility of the alleged victims, the guilt of the defendant and the strength of the state’s evidence; (2) whether the admission of such prosecutorial testimony constitutes structural error or, instead, is subject to harmless error review; and (3) whether a reviewing court’s conclusion that the evidence at trial supports the defendant’s convictions even excluding the grand jury prosecutor’s testimony meets the state’s burden of proving harmless error beyond a reasonable doubt.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 10 2022||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 11, 2022)|
|Jan 27 2022||Waiver of right of respondent Louisiana to respond filed.|
|Feb 02 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.|
|Feb 08 2022||Response Requested. (Due March 10, 2022)|
|Feb 14 2022||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 10, 2022 to April 8, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Feb 16 2022||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 8, 2022.|
|Apr 08 2022||Brief of respondent Louisiana in opposition filed.|
|Apr 26 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.|
|May 04 2022||Record Requested.|
|May 23 2022||Record received from the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth District. The record is electronic and contains sealed materials.|
|May 31 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/16/2022.|
|Jun 13 2022||Rescheduled.|
|Jun 21 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.|
|Jun 29 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2022.|
|Sep 12 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.|
|Oct 03 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.|
|Oct 11 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/14/2022.|
|Oct 24 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.|
|Oct 31 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/4/2022.|
|Nov 07 2022||Petition DENIED. Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Jackson joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)|
Today at SCOTUS: One oral argument on the statute of limitations in the Quiet Title Act. Is it "jurisdictional"? Or just a "claim-processing rule"? That might sound arcane, but cases like these affect the ability of citizens to sue the federal government.
A squabble over a forest road may pave the way for further narrowing of “jurisdictional” timing rules - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in Wilkins v. United States is next in a protracted line of cases in which the court ...
Bribery or lobbying?
Percoco v. United States in a TikTok minute.
JUST IN: For the second time in the past week, SCOTUS denies an emergency request to block the execution of Kevin Johnson. The execution is scheduled for tonight in Missouri. Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissent from the brief order allowing the execution to proceed.
Today at SCOTUS: Can the federal government prioritize certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for deportation over others? And do states have standing to sue the government if they disagree with those priorities? @AHoweBlogger previews U.S. v. Texas:
In U.S. v. Texas, broad questions over immigration enforcement and states’ ability to challenge federal policies - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a dispute over the Biden administration’s authority to...
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral arguments in a pair of public-corruption cases, both stemming from scandals in New York politics that arose during Andrew Cuomo's time as governor. In both cases, the defendants are claiming prosecutorial overreach.