|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-1340||10th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2018|
Issue: Whether the provisions of the Medicaid Act that require participating states to include in their plans the ability of eligible individuals to obtain services from any “qualified” provider, 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(23), but grant states broad authority to exclude providers for violating state or federal requirements, 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(p), indicate that Congress clearly and unambiguously intended to create an implied private right of action to challenge a state’s determination that a provider is not “qualified” under the applicable state regulations.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Mar 21 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 23, 2018)|
|Apr 16 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 23, 2018 to May 23, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 19 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 23, 2018.|
|Apr 23 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Americans United for Life filed.|
|Apr 23 2018||Brief amici curiae of State of Indiana, et al. filed.|
|May 16 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 23, 2018 to June 22, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|May 16 2018||Response to motion to extend the time to file a response from petitioner filed.|
|May 22 2018||Motion to further extend the time to file a response denied.|
|May 23 2018||Brief of respondents Planned Parenthood of Kansas, et al. in opposition filed.|
|May 24 2018||Waiver of the 14-day waiting period under Rule 15.5 filed by petitioner.|
|May 29 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/14/2018.|
|Jun 01 2018||Reply of petitioner Jeff Andersen, Secretary, Kansas Department of Health and Environment filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 05 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Jul 18 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.|
|Oct 01 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.|
|Oct 09 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.|
|Oct 22 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.|
|Oct 29 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.|
|Nov 05 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018.|
|Nov 13 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.|
|Nov 26 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.|
|Dec 03 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.|
|Dec 10 2018||Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas, with whom Justice Alito and Justice Gorsuch join, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I dissent for the reasons set out in Gee v. Planned Parenthood, 586 U. S. ___ (2018) (Thomas, J., dissenting).|
A surprising stat at this point in the term: Both Kagan and Breyer have been in the majority slightly more often than Alito.
Kavanaugh continues to have the highest rate (as he has for most of the term). Sotomayor has the lowest.
Still 15 cases left. So this could all change.
The first two pieces in our symposium on yesterday's decision in Fulton v. Philadelphia are up. First, @JimOleske dissects the decision in light of the court's shadow-docket ruling in Tandon v. Newsom, which took a very different approach to free exercise.
Fulton quiets Tandon’s thunder: A free exercise puzzle - SCOTUSblog
This article is the first entry in a symposium on the court’s decision in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. ...
Number of pages written by each justice in the five decisions handed down this week (majority opinions, concurrences, and dissents all included):
While today's decision in Fulton v. Philadelphia is a win for a Catholic group seeking to participate in the city's foster program, it stops short of the broad endorsement of religious freedom the challengers had hoped for. Here's @AHoweBlogger's analysis:
Court holds that city’s refusal to make referrals to faith-based agency violates Constitution - SCOTUSblog
In a clash between religious freedom and public policies that protect LGBTQ people, the Supreme Court ruled Thursday...
Now do we say that Sonia Sotomayor and the other liberals supported child slavery by all voting for Nestle today? Of course not. And Nestle’s lawyers like @Neal_katyal obviously don’t either. The cheap attacks on the court and thoughtful lawyers did not age well. -tg
The claim @nealkatyal was defending slavery is flat wrong & libelous. Here is what he actually said, which is the reverse: child slavery is abhorrent, criminal, horrific. Remember in a pending case he can't comment, so read what he really said in full.
Tired from this morning's momentous opinions? Get ready to do it all again next week -- three times. The court just revealed that next Monday, Wednesday and Friday will all be opinion days.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.