|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Issues: (1) Whether enablement for purposes of Section 112 of the Patent Act is “a question of fact to be determined by the jury,” as the Supreme Court has held, or “a question of law that [the court] review[s] without deference,” as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit holds; and (2) whether enablement is governed by the statutory requirement that the specification teach those skilled in the art to “make and use” the claimed invention, or whether it must instead enable those skilled in the art “to reach the full scope of claimed embodiments” without undue experimentation—i.e., to cumulatively identify and make all or nearly all embodiments of the invention without substantial “‘time and effort.’”
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 18 2021||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 22, 2021)|
|Dec 22 2021||Brief amici curiae of Association of University Technology Managers, Inc., et al.|
|Dec 22 2021||Brief amicus curiae of GlaxoSmithKline plc filed.|
|Dec 22 2021||Brief amici curiae of Intellectual Property Professors filed.|
|Jan 05 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.|
|Jan 11 2022||Response Requested. (Due February 10, 2022)|
|Jan 12 2022||Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 10, 2022 to March 14, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 14 2022||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 14, 2022.|
|Mar 14 2022||Brief of respondents Sanofi, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Mar 28 2022||Reply of petitioners Amgen Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 29 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.|
|Apr 18 2022||The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT, followed by opinions starting at 10. You know the drill: We'll be firing up our live blog and breaking it all down. See you there.
Just in: The next Supreme Court opinion day will be next Monday. The court expects to release one or more opinions in argued cases from the current term.
End of an era: Here is NBC News prez Noah Oppenheim's memo about Pete Williams' plan to retire this summer
The Supreme Court sides with Sen. Ted Cruz in his First Amendment challenge to a federal campaign-finance law that limits how and when candidates can recoup loans that they make to their own campaigns. The vote is 6-3 along ideological lines.
In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-branch factual findings that determine whether non-citizens are eligible for "adjustment of status." Those findings can dictate whether a person is deported.
SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases: Jones v. Hendrix (a habeas corpus case) and SEC v. Cochran (a case about the power of district courts to hear challenges to the constitutionality of the SEC's administrative law proceedings). Full order list here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051622zor_hgcj.pdf