|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|11-798||9th Cir.||Apr 16, 2013||Jun 13, 2013||9-0||Kagan||OT 2012|
Holding: The Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (FAAAA) expressly preempts provisions in concession agreements between the port and short-haul trucking companies that require trucks moving cargo in and out of the port to affix placards bearing a phone number to receive complaints to each truck and to submit a plan for off-street parking for the trucks.
Judgment: Reversed in part and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on June 13, 2013. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 22 2011||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 23, 2012)|
|Jan 4 2012||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including February 21, 2012, for all respondents.|
|Jan 23 2012||Brief amici curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, et al. filed.|
|Jan 23 2012||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.|
|Jan 23 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc. filed.|
|Jan 23 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Airlines for America filed.|
|Feb 21 2012||Brief of respondents National Resources Defense Council, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Feb 21 2012||Brief of respondents City of Los Angeles, California, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Mar 2 2012||Reply of petitioner American Trucking Associations, Inc. filed.|
|Mar 7 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 23, 2012.|
|Mar 26 2012||The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
|Nov 30 2012||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Dec 10 2012||Supplemental brief of petitioner American Trucking Associations, Inc. filed.|
|Dec 12 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 4, 2013.|
|Jan 7 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 11, 2013.|
|Jan 11 2013||Petition GRANTED limited to Questions 1 and 3 presented by the petition.|
|Feb 11 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, April 16, 2013|
|Feb 15 2013||Brief of petitioner American Trucking Associations, Inc. filed.|
|Feb 15 2013||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)|
|Feb 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of the United States supporting reversal filed.|
|Feb 22 2013||Brief amici curiae of Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc. filed.|
|Feb 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Airlines for America filed.|
|Feb 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of California Construction Trucking Association filed.|
|Feb 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence and Harbor Trucking Association filed.|
|Feb 22 2013||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America. filed.|
|Feb 25 2013||Record from U.S.C.A. for 9th Circuit is electronic.|
|Feb 25 2013||Record from U.S.D.C. for Central District of California is electronic..|
|Mar 1 2013||CIRCULATED.|
|Mar 18 2013||Brief of respondents City of Los Angeles, California, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 18 2013||Brief of respondents National Resources Defense Council, et al. (Distributed) filed.|
|Mar 25 2013||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Mar 25 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Los Angleles Chamber of Commerce filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 25 2013||Brief amici curiae of National Organization of Counties, et al. filed.|
|Mar 25 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Airports Council International - North America filed.|
|Mar 25 2013||Brief amici curiae of California and Washington filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 1 2013||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Apr 5 2013||Reply of petitioner American Trucking Associations, Inc. filed. (Distributed).|
|Apr 16 2013||Argued. For petitioner: Daniel N. Lerman, Washington, D. C.; and John F. Bash, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) Steve Rosenthal for the respondents.|
|Jun 13 2013||Adjudged to be REVERSED IN PART and case REMANDED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Thomas, J., filed a concurring opinion.|
|Jul 15 2013||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Incidentally, Gorsuch had been scheduled to give a speech at the University of Wyoming today, but his visit was canceled due to COVID.
Nothing from Kagan or Gorsuch though 😢 https://twitter.com/scotusblog/status/1438530948207874050
💥 Breyer continues book tour (including @colbertlateshow two nights ago).
💥 Barrett gave a speech Sunday @uofl.
💥 Thomas is slated to give the 2021 Tocqueville Lecture today @NotreDame (but, like Barrett's speech, there is apparently no livestream).
Can modern art shed new light on landmark Supreme Court rulings? A recent book says yes. Artist Xavier Cortada created 10 paintings depicting SCOTUS cases, and scholars used the paintings to re-examine each case's legacy. Here's @amanda_frost1's review:
The art of justice: Re-examining landmark Supreme Court cases through expressionist paintings - SCOTUSblog
Tired of reading jargon-filled law review articles with hundreds of footnotes? The perfect antidote is Painting Consti...
NEW: The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing tomorrow on Biden's nomination of Elizabeth Prelogar to be solicitor general, the federal government's top lawyer at the Supreme Court.
In separate remarks on Sunday, two justices argued that SCOTUS is not a political body.
Justice Barrett did so in a speech in Kentucky, after being introduced by Mitch McConnell:
Justice Breyer did so in an interview on Fox News: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-justice-stephen-breyer-political-reforms
Barrett concerned about public perception of Supreme Court
LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) — Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett expressed concerns Sunday that the public may incre...
SCOTUS provides instructions to the parties in the case of John Ramirez, the death-row inmate who has requested that his pastor be permitted to lay hands on him and pray out loud in the death chamber.
#SCOTUS issued a Friday-night order outlining specific questions for inmate John Ramirez & Texas to address in their briefing in his case, which is scheduled for argument in November. The Court put Ramirez's execution on hold earlier this week: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/091021zr_ap6c.pdf