|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|11-798||9th Cir.||Apr 16, 2013||Jun 13, 2013||9-0||Kagan||OT 2012|
Holding: The Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (FAAAA) expressly preempts provisions in concession agreements between the port and short-haul trucking companies that require trucks moving cargo in and out of the port to affix placards bearing a phone number to receive complaints to each truck and to submit a plan for off-street parking for the trucks.
Judgment: Reversed in part and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on June 13, 2013. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 22 2011||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 23, 2012)|
|Jan 4 2012||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including February 21, 2012, for all respondents.|
|Jan 23 2012||Brief amici curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, et al. filed.|
|Jan 23 2012||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.|
|Jan 23 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc. filed.|
|Jan 23 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Airlines for America filed.|
|Feb 21 2012||Brief of respondents National Resources Defense Council, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Feb 21 2012||Brief of respondents City of Los Angeles, California, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Mar 2 2012||Reply of petitioner American Trucking Associations, Inc. filed.|
|Mar 7 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 23, 2012.|
|Mar 26 2012||The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
|Nov 30 2012||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Dec 10 2012||Supplemental brief of petitioner American Trucking Associations, Inc. filed.|
|Dec 12 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 4, 2013.|
|Jan 7 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 11, 2013.|
|Jan 11 2013||Petition GRANTED limited to Questions 1 and 3 presented by the petition.|
|Feb 11 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, April 16, 2013|
|Feb 15 2013||Brief of petitioner American Trucking Associations, Inc. filed.|
|Feb 15 2013||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)|
|Feb 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of the United States supporting reversal filed.|
|Feb 22 2013||Brief amici curiae of Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc. filed.|
|Feb 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Airlines for America filed.|
|Feb 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of California Construction Trucking Association filed.|
|Feb 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence and Harbor Trucking Association filed.|
|Feb 22 2013||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America. filed.|
|Feb 25 2013||Record from U.S.C.A. for 9th Circuit is electronic.|
|Feb 25 2013||Record from U.S.D.C. for Central District of California is electronic..|
|Mar 1 2013||CIRCULATED.|
|Mar 18 2013||Brief of respondents City of Los Angeles, California, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 18 2013||Brief of respondents National Resources Defense Council, et al. (Distributed) filed.|
|Mar 25 2013||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Mar 25 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Los Angleles Chamber of Commerce filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 25 2013||Brief amici curiae of National Organization of Counties, et al. filed.|
|Mar 25 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Airports Council International - North America filed.|
|Mar 25 2013||Brief amici curiae of California and Washington filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 1 2013||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Apr 5 2013||Reply of petitioner American Trucking Associations, Inc. filed. (Distributed).|
|Apr 16 2013||Argued. For petitioner: Daniel N. Lerman, Washington, D. C.; and John F. Bash, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) Steve Rosenthal for the respondents.|
|Jun 13 2013||Adjudged to be REVERSED IN PART and case REMANDED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Thomas, J., filed a concurring opinion.|
|Jul 15 2013||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Released today: annual financial disclosures for eight of the nine justices. Key takeaways: substantial book-royalty income for Sotomayor and Gorsuch; reduced travel reimbursements across the board during the pandemic.
Full story from @AHoweBlogger:
Less travel, plenty of royalties for justices in 2020 - SCOTUSblog
The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic were reflected in an unusual source: the justices’ 2020 financial disclosur...
Opinions next week — Monday and Thursday at 10:00 a.m. ET.
With 21 opinions to go, #SCOTUS enters the home stretch: Opinions expected on Monday and Thursday again next week, at 10 am Eastern both days. Court will also issue orders from today's conference at 9:30 am on Monday, June 14.
NEW: SCOTUS rules against federal government's interpretation of the Armed Career Criminal Act. Court says a felony involving recklessness does not satisfy the law's "use of physical force" element and thus does not trigger the law's "violent felony" mandatory minimum sentence.
It's a @SCOTUSblog kind of morning
R.I.P. Judge Robert Katzmann of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit. His influence on SCOTUS and American law was enormous.
The Supreme Court will release opinion(s?) at 10:00 a.m. ET. We’ll fire up the live blog at 9:45.
There are 22 outstanding opinions in argued cases including the Affordable Care Act, LGBTQ+ / religious liberty, voting rights, and student speech. https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/06/announcement-of-opinions-for-thursday-june-10/
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.