|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|15-599||3d Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2015|
Issue: Whether the Third Circuit erred by deferring to EPA’s interpretation of the words “total maximum daily load” to permit EPA to impose a complex regulatory scheme that does much more than cap daily levels of total pollutant loading and that displaces powers reserved to the states.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 17 2015||Application (15A305) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 4, 2015 to November 6, 2015, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|Sep 18 2015||Application (15A305) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until November 6, 2015.|
|Nov 6 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 9, 2015)|
|Nov 17 2015||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners,|
|Dec 3 2015||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 8, 2015.|
|Dec 7 2015||Brief amici curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation, et al. filed.|
|Dec 9 2015||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.|
|Dec 9 2015||Brief amici curiae of Ninety-Two Members of Congress filed.|
|Dec 9 2015||Brief amici curiae of Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, et al. filed.|
|Dec 9 2015||Brief amici curiae of States of Kansas, Indiana, Missouri, and 19 Other States filed.|
|Dec 22 2015||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including January 19, 2016, for all respondents.|
|Jan 7 2016||Waiver of right of respondents Virginia Association of Municipal Wasteswater Agencies, Maryland Association of Municipal Wastewater Agencies, National Association of Clean Water Agencies, et al. to respond filed.|
|Jan 7 2016||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for respondents.|
|Jan 19 2016||Brief of Federal Respondent in opposition filed.|
|Jan 19 2016||Brief of respondents Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.|
|Jan 19 2016||Brief of respondent Intervenor Respondent Pennsylvania Municipal Authorities Association in opposition filed.|
|Feb 2 2016||Reply of petitioners American Farm Bureau Federation, et al. filed.|
|Feb 3 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 19, 2016.|
|Feb 29 2016||Petition DENIED.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...