Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
16-8058 | 5th Cir. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2017 |
Issue: Whether 18 U.S.C. § 16(b) is unconstitutionally vague because it requires application of an indeterminate risk standard to the “ordinary case” of an individual’s prior conviction.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Feb 17 2017 | Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 24, 2017) |
Mar 16 2017 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including April 24, 2017. |
Apr 25 2017 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including May 24, 2017. |
May 18 2017 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including June 23, 2017. |
Jun 15 2017 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including July 24, 2017. |
Jul 24 2017 | Memorandum of respondent United States in opposition filed. |
Jul 27 2017 | Reply of petitioner Francisco Alvaro-Velasco filed. |
Aug 03 2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/25/2017. |
Apr 17 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/20/2018. |
Apr 23 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/27/2018. |
May 07 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/10/2018. |
May 14 2018 | Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Sessions v. Dimaya, 584 U. S. ____ (2018). |
Jun 15 2018 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |