|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|11-9335||4th Cir.||Jan 14, 2013||Jun 17, 2013||5-4||Thomas||OT 2012|
Holding: Because mandatory minimum sentences increase the penalty for a crime, any fact that increases the mandatory minimum is an “element” of the crime that must be submitted to the jury.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on June 17, 2013. Justice Sotomayor filed a concurring opinion in which Justice Ginsburg and Justice Kagan joined. Justice Breyer filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Chief Justice Roberts filed a dissenting opinion in which Justices Scalia and Kennedy joined. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Mar 14 2012||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 16, 2012)|
|Mar 22 2012||Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.|
|Mar 29 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 13, 2012.|
|Apr 10 2012||Response Requested . (Due May 10, 2012)|
|Apr 10 2012||Record Requested .|
|Apr 16 2012||Record received from US Court of Appeals for the the Fourth Circuit (one envelope containing joint appendices; including one sealed envelope). Remaining record is on PACER.|
|Apr 16 2012||Record of the U.S. District Court Eastern District of Virginia - (Richmond) on PACER.|
|May 1 2012||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including June 11, 2012.|
|Jun 11 2012||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Jun 20 2012||Reply of petitioner Allen Ryan Alleyne filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 21 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 24, 2012.|
|Oct 1 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 5, 2012.|
|Oct 5 2012||Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED.|
|Oct 31 2012||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, January 14, 2013.|
|Nov 19 2012||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Nov 19 2012||Brief of petitioner Allen Ryan Alleyne filed.|
|Nov 21 2012||Brief amici curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. filed.|
|Nov 26 2012||Brief amicus curiae of New York Council of Defense Lawyers filed.|
|Nov 26 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Center on the Administration of Criminal Law filed.|
|Nov 26 2012||Brief amici curiae of Sentencing Project, and The American Civil Liberties Union filed.|
|Nov 26 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Families Against Mandatory Minimums filed.|
|Dec 6 2012||CIRCULATED|
|Dec 19 2012||Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 26 2012||Brief amici curiae of Texas, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 7 2013||Reply of petitioner Allen Ryan Alleyne filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 14 2013||Argued. For petitioner: Mary E. Maguire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Richmond, VA. For respondent: Michael R. Dreeben, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Jun 17 2013||Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED Thomas, J., announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, III-B, III-C, and IV, in which Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined, and an opinion with respet to Parts II and III-A, in which Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Sotomayor, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Ginsburg and Kagan, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Roberts, C. J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Scalia and Kennedy, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed a dissenting opinion.|
|Jul 19 2013||JUDGMENT ISSUED|
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.