|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-740||D.C. Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2018|
Issues: (1) Whether the government’s statutory authority to detain Moath Hamza Ahmed al-Alwi has unraveled; (2) whether, alternatively, the government’s statutory authority to detain al-Alwi has expired because the conflict in which he was captured has ended; and (3) whether the Authorization for Use of Military Force authorizes, and the Constitution permits, detention of an individual who was not “engaged in an armed conflict against the United States” in Afghanistan prior to his capture.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 15 2018||Application (18A406) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 5, 2018 to December 5, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Oct 18 2018||Application (18A406) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until December 5, 2018.|
|Dec 05 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 10, 2019)|
|Jan 03 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 10, 2019 to February 11, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 07 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 11, 2019.|
|Feb 11 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 11, 2019 to March 13, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Feb 11 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 13, 2019.|
|Mar 11 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 13, 2019 to April 3, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 12 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 3, 2019.|
|Apr 03 2019||Brief of respondents Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Apr 16 2019||Reply of petitioner Moath Hamza Ahmed al-Alwi filed.|
|Apr 17 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.|
|May 13 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.|
|May 20 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.|
|May 28 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.|
|Jun 03 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2019.|
|Jun 10 2019||Petition DENIED. Statement of Justice Breyer respecting the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion) Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.|
The Supreme Court got rid of several cases this morning -- in one fell swoop. Read @AHoweBlogger's latest coverage of the emoluments cases, spiritual advisers at Texas executions, Texas abortion policies, COVID restrictions, and NY political corruption.
Justices vacate rulings on Trump and emoluments - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Monday morning released orders from the justices’ private conference on Friday, Jan. 22. The justices once again did not ac...
In this morning's orders list, SCOTUS took no action on pending cert petitions involving:
- Mississippi's near-ban on abortions after 15 weeks,
- a Trump rule banning Title X clinics from providing abortion referrals,
- the Trump administration's "public charge" immigration rule.
No real opinions today. The Supreme Court dismissed cert as "improvidently granted" in Henry Schein Inc. v. Archer and White Sales Inc.—a case about arbitration agreements.
That's all for today, folks.
The Supreme Court does not add any cases to its docket. It sends the Trump emoluments case back to the lower court with instructions to dismiss as moot.
Here is the orders list. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/012521zor_3f14.pdf
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.