• Lamone v. Benisek Partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts.
• Department of Commerce v. New York The secretary of the Department of Commerce did not violate the enumeration clause or the Census Act in deciding to reinstate a citizenship question on the 2020 census questionnaire, but the district court was warranted in remanding the case back to the agency where the evidence tells a story that does not match the secretary’s explanation for his decision.
• Mitchell v. Wisconsin The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s judgment – affirming the drunk-driving convictions of Gerald Mitchell, who was administered a warrantless blood test while he was unconscious – is vacated, and the case is remanded.
• Rucho v. Common Cause Partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts.
• Kisor v. Wilkie Auer v. Robbins and Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co – under which deference is given to an agency’s reasonable reading of its own genuinely ambiguous regulations – are not overruled.
• Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. Thomas Tennessee’s 2-year durational-residency requirement applicable to retail liquor store license applicants violates the commerce clause and is not saved by the 21st Amendment.
• United States v. Haymond The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit’s judgment – that 18 U. S. C. §3583(k)’s last two sentences are unconstitutional and unenforceable – is vacated, and the case is remanded.
• Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media Where commercial or financial information is both customarily and actually treated as private by its owner and provided to the government under an assurance of privacy, the information is “confidential” within the meaning of 5 U. S. C. §552(b)(4), the Freedom of Information Act’s Exemption 4.
• Iancu v. Brunetti The Lanham Act prohibition on the registration of “immoral” or “scandalous” trademarks infringes the First Amendment.
• The Dutra Group v. Batterton A plaintiff may not recover punitive damages on a maritime claim of unseaworthiness.
• United States v. Davis Title 18 U. S. C. §924(c)(3)(B), which provides enhanced penalties for using a firearm during a “crime of violence,” is unconstitutionally vague.

• Tributes to Justice John Paul Stevens
• Symposium on the court’s ruling in Department of Commerce v. New York
• Symposium on the court’s ruling in Rucho v. Common Cause and Lamone v. Benisek
• Symposium on the court’s ruling in Kisor v. Wilkie
• Symposium on the court’s ruling in The American Legion v. American Humanist Association
• Symposium on what’s next in June Medical Services, LLC v. Gee

• Orders | June 28, 2019
• Opinions | June 27, 2019
• Opinions | June 26, 2019
• Orders and opinions | June 24, 2019
• Opinions | June 21, 2019
• Opinions | June 20, 2019
• Orders and opinions | June 17, 2019
• Orders and opinions | June 10, 2019
• Orders and opinions | June 3, 2019
• Orders and opinions | May 28, 2019
• Orders and opinions | May 20, 2019
• Orders and opinions | May 13, 2019
• Orders and opinions | April 29, 2019
• Opinions | April 24, 2019
• Opinions | April 23, 2019
• Orders and opinions | April 1, 2019
• Opinions | March 27, 2019
• Opinions | March 26, 2019
• Opinions | March 20, 2019
• Opinions | March 19, 2019
• Orders and opinions | March 4, 2019
• Opinions | February 27, 2019 (with Casetext’s Pablo Arredondo)
• Opinions | February 26, 2019 (with Casetext’s Jake Heller)
• Opinions | February 20, 2019
• Orders and opinions | January 22, 2019
• Opinions | January 15, 2019
• Opinions | January 8, 2019
• Day five of confirmation hearing | September 27, 2018
• Day four of confirmation hearing | September 7, 2018
• Day three of confirmation hearing | September 6, 2018
• Day two of confirmation hearing | September 5, 2018
• Day one of confirmation hearing | September 4, 2018

See all