Petitions to watch | Conference of 11.23.10
This edition of "Petitions to watch" features cases up for consideration at the Justices' November 23 conference. These are petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues.
Smith v. United States
Docket: 10-18
Issue(s): Whether, when a trial judge’s restriction on the cross-examination of a prosecution witness is challenged on appeal as a violation of the Confrontation Clause, the proper standard of review is de novo or abuse of discretion.
Certiorari stage documents:
Johnson v. Estate of Terry Gee, Jr.
Docket: 10-86
Issue(s): Whether a jail official who defers to treatment decisions of medical professionals working within the jail facility can still be considered to be deliberately indifferent to serious medical needs of an inmate in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Certiorari stage documents:
Webster v. United States
Docket: 10-150
Issue(s): Whether the Supreme Court can review a decision by a court of appeals that it lacks jurisdiction to review a federal prisoner’s motion based on newly discovered evidence that the prisoner is mentally retarded and therefore constitutionally ineligible for execution, even if that evidence does not negate the prisoner’s guilt; whether, if AEDPA precludes a successive habeas petition in such a scenario, it is unconstitutional.
Certiorari stage documents:
Cook County, Illinois v. Thomas
Docket: 10-180
Issue(s): (1) Whether the lower court properly held that the issuance of a "no duplication of damages" instruction to the jury in a Section 1983 case cures any error resulting from incorrect adjoining instructions that invited the jury to assess damages "by defendant" and "by claim" and to decide the legal question of joint liability; and (2) whether the adjudication of constitutional tort claims against multiple defendants for a single, indivisible injury violates either the law of damages in Section 1983 actions or the defendant’s Seventh Amendment right to a fair trial.
Certiorari stage documents:
CSX Transportation v. McBride
Docket: 10-235
Issue(s): Whether the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60, requires proof of proximate causation.
Certiorari stage documents:
Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett (Granted )
Docket: 10-238
Issue(s): (1) Whether the First Amendment forbids states from providing additional government subsidies to publicly financed candidates that are triggered by independent expenditure groups' speech against such candidates; and (2) whether the First Amendment forbids states from providing additional government subsidies to publicly financed candidates that are triggered by the fundraising or expenditures by these candidates' privately financed opponents.
Certiorari stage documents:
- Opinion below (9th Circuit)
- Petition for certiorari (unavailable)
- Brief in opposition (unavailable)
- Petitioners' reply (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of Center for Competitive Politics (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of Cato Institute (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of the Yankee Institute for Public Policy (unavailable)
McComish v. Bennett (Granted )
Docket: 10-239
Issue(s): (1) Whether Arizona's matching funds trigger, which provides publicly financed candidates with additional subsidies that are triggered by independent expenditures or by the raising and spending of money by privately financed candidates and their supporters, violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments; and (2) whether the Arizona law violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments by regulating campaign financing to equalize resources among competing candidates and interest groups, rather than advancing a compelling state interest in the least restrictive manner.
Certiorari stage documents:
Wal-Mart v. Dukes (Granted )
Docket: 10-277
Issue(s): (1) Whether claims for monetary relief can be certified under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) and, if so, under what circumstances; and (2) whether the class certification ordered under rule 23(b)(2) was consistent with rule 23(a).
Certiorari stage documents:
- Opinion below (9th Circuit)
- Petition for certiorari (unavailable)
- Brief in opposition (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of Intel (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of the Defense Bar (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of Retail Litigation Center, Inc. (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of Altria Group et al. (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of the Equal Employment Advisory Council (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of Pacific Legal Foundation (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of Washington Legal Foundation (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of California Employment Law Council (unavailable)
- Petitioner's reply (unavailable)
Douglas v. Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital (Granted )
Docket: 10-283
Issue(s): Whether Medicaid recipients and providers may maintain a cause of action under the Supremacy Clause to enforce § 1396a(a)(30)(A) by asserting that the provision preempts a state law reducing reimbursement rates.
Certiorari stage documents:
City of Colton v. American Promotional Events, Inc.-West
Docket: 10-284
Issue(s): Whether the declaratory judgment provision of § 113(g)(2) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA") preempts the Declaratory Judgment Act as applied in the CERCLA context, thereby precluding CERCLA plaintiffs from asserting declaratory relief claims for future clean-up costs if they cannot recover past clean-up costs.
Certiorari stage documents:
Hall v. Ward
Docket: 10-288
Issue(s): (1) Whether the Eleventh Circuit misapplied 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(1) by failing to give any deference to the state habeas court's factual findings on a habeas petitioner's juror/bailiff misconduct claim; and (2) whether the Eleventh Circuit's finding of prejudice conflicts with Supreme Court precedent insofar as it found that the habeas petitioner failed to establish that the trial court did not answer any question posed by the jury, and when it disregarded the factual findings of the state habeas court that any information provided to the jury was not reversible error; and (3) whether the Eleventh Circuit's decision, which relied on evidence that was not admitted to assess prejudice and harm, conflicts with Supreme Court and circuit precedent.
Certiorari stage documents:
Microsoft v. i4i Limited Partnership (Granted )
Note: Goldstein, Howe & Russell represent 3M Company et al. as amici curiae in support of respondents.
Docket: 10-290
Issue(s): Whether the invalidity defense provided for in the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 282, must be proved by clear and convincing evidence.
Certiorari stage documents:
- Opinion below (Federal Circuit)
- Petition for certiorari (unavailable)
- Brief in opposition (unavailable)
- Amicus brief for Google, Inc., et al. (unavailable)
- Amicus brief for Yahoo!, Inc. (unavailable)
- Amicus brief for Teva Pharmaceuticals, et al. (unavailable)
- Amicus brief for Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, et al. (unavailable)
- Amicus brief for Intel (unavailable)
- Amicus brief for Facebook Inc., et al.(unavailable)
- Amicus brief for Electronic Frontier Foundation, et al.(unavailable)
- Amicus brief for CTIA - The Wireless Association (unavailable)
- Amicus brief for Apple Inc. (unavailable)
- Amicus brief for Acushnet, et al. (unavailable)
- Amicus brief for Thirty-Six Professors (unavailable)
- Petitioner's reply (unavailable)
Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay
Docket: 10-300
Issue(s): Whether, under the doctrine of contributory trademark infringement, a defendant can be held liable for operating a marketplace that it knows is used to sell substantial quantities of goods that infringe a plaintiff's trademark, even if it does not know that particular goods are infringing.
Certiorari stage documents:
Dunn v. Louisiana
Docket: 10-386
Issue(s): Whether a court's modification of the three-step Batson v. Kentucky analysis, requiring the defense to prove that its strikes were not motivated by race, while simultaneously requiring it to prove that the state's strikes were motivated by race, violates the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Certiorari stage documents:
Guevara v. Republic of Peru
Docket: 10-389
Issue(s): Whether the "direct effect" clause of the commercial activity exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(2), requires evidence that a "legally significant act" occurred within the United States to vest U.S. courts with jurisdiction over a foreign sovereign.
Certiorari stage documents:
Bryant v. Media Right Productions, Inc.
Docket: 10-415
Issue(s): Whether statutory damages against a copyright infringer who makes an unauthorized digital copy of a music album, then offers individual songs from the album for sale or distribution on the Internet, are calculated on a per-album or per-song basis.
Certiorari stage documents:
Werner v. Peak Alarm Company, Inc.
Docket: 10-430
Issue(s): (1) Whether a police officer lacks probable cause to momentarily detain a person who subjectively believes that he did not commit any crime and, if so, whether the office is entitled to qualified immunity; and (2) whether the Utah Supreme Court erred when it failed to analyze whether the police officers could have reasonably believed that probable cause existed under the circumstances.
Certiorari stage documents:
_________________________________________________________________
DISCLOSURE: Akin Gump and Howe & Russell represent one of the parties in the case below; the case is listed here without regard to its chances of being granted.
Bannister v. Illinois
Note: Akin Gump and Howe & Russell represent the petitioner in this case.
Docket: 09-1576
Issue(s): Whether the prosecution's presentation of testimony at trial subject to a consistency provision in a plea agreement - that is, a provision binding the witness to testify consistently with prior statements made to the police or prosecutors while not under oath - contravenes the Due Process Clause.
Certiorari stage documents:
_________________________________________________________________
The following petitions have been re-listed for the conference of November 23. If any other paid petitions are re-distributed for this conference, we will add them below as soon as their re-distribution is noted on the docket.
Beer v. United States
Docket: 09-1395
Issue(s): Whether the Compensation Clause of Article III prevents Congress from withholding the future judicial salary adjustments established by the Ethics Reform Act of 1989.
Certiorari stage documents:
- Denial of rehearing en banc (Federal Circuit)
- Summary affirmance (Federal Circuit)
- Petition for certiorari
- Brief in opposition
- Petitioners' reply
- Amicus brief of Bar Associations
- Amicus brief of the American Bar Association
- Amicus brief of International Municipal Lawyers Association
- Amicus brief of Federal Judges Association
Alderman v. United States
Docket: 09-1555
Issue(s): Whether Scarborough v. United States (1977) recognizes a distinct Commerce Clause authority, beyond the three categories recognized in United States v. Lopez (1995), United States v. Morrison (2000), and Gonzales v. Raich (2005), such that a federal statute which “cannot be justified as a regulation of the channels of commerce, as a protection of the instrumentalities of commerce, or as a regulation of intrastate activity that substantially affects interstate commerce,†may be sustained based on a “minimal nexus†between the activity regulated and interstate commerce.
Certiorari stage documents:
Allen v. Lawhorn
Docket: 10-24
Issue(s): Whether a state court’s determination that trial counsel’s waiver of a penalty-phase closing argument did not prejudice the defendant is “contrary to†Supreme Court precedent.
Certiorari stage documents:
Harper v. Maverick Recording Company
Docket: 10-94
Issue(s): Whether the "inadvertent innocent infringer" defense to copyright infringement should be eliminated for all Internet music downloading.
Certiorari stage documents:
Recommended Citation: Christa Culver, Petitions to watch | Conference of 11.23.10, SCOTUSblog (Nov. 22, 2010, 2:02 PM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2010/11/petitions-to-watch-conference-of-11-23-10/