Skip to content

Johnson v. Lee

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
15-789 Not Argued May 9, 2025 n/a Per Curiam OT 2015

Holding: Under California"s "Dixon bar," a defendant procedurally defaults a claim raised for the first time on state collateral review if he could have raised it earlier on direct appeal. Because that bar is longstanding, oft-cited, and shared by habeas courts across the nation, the Ninth Circuit's holding that the bar is inadequate to preclude federal habeas review is reversed.

Judgment: Summarily reversed and remanded in a per curiam opinion on May 9, 2025.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
11/02/2015Application (15A484) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 15, 2015 to December 15, 2015, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
11/05/2015Application (15A484) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until December 15, 2015.
12/15/2015Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 19, 2016)
01/15/2016Order extending time to file response to petition to and including February 18, 2016.
01/19/2016Brief amici curiae of Alabama, et al. filed.
01/19/2016Brief amicus curiae of Criminal Justice Legal Foundation filed.
02/11/2016Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including March 21, 2016.
03/17/2016Brief of respondent Donna Kay Lee in opposition filed.
03/17/2016Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Donna Kay Lee.
04/04/2016Reply of petitioner Deborah K. Johnson, Warden filed.
04/06/2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 22, 2016.
04/25/2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 29, 2016.
05/09/2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 12, 2016.
05/16/2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 19, 2016.
05/23/2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 26, 2016.
05/31/2016Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
05/31/2016Petition GRANTED. Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion)
07/05/2016JUDGMENT ISSUED