Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org Inc.
Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18-1150 | 11th Cir. | Dec 2, 2019 | Apr 27, 2020 | 5-4 | Roberts | OT 2019 |
Holding: Under the government edicts doctrine, the annotations beneath the statutory provisions in the Official Code of Georgia Annotated are ineligible for copyright protection.
Judgment: Affirmed, 5-4, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on April 27, 2020. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Alito joined in full and Justice Breyer joined except for Part II"A and footnote 6. Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Breyer joined.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Live blog of orders and opinions (Update: Completed) (Kalvis Golde, April 27, 2020)
- Opinion analysis: Sharply divided bench rejects Georgia's copyright in annotations of Georgia statutes (Ronald Mann, April 27, 2020)
- Argument analysis: Justices debate copyrightability of state legislative annotations (Ronald Mann, December 3, 2019)
- Argument preview: Justices to consider copyrightability of state legislative codes (Ronald Mann, November 26, 2019)
- Justices bulk up next term's docket (Amy Howe, June 24, 2019)
- Relist Watch (John Elwood, June 20, 2019)
- Petitions of the week (Aurora Barnes, April 12, 2019)