Friday round-up

At NPR, Nina Totenberg reports that “[i]n a rare moment of direct criticism, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts rebuked President Trump on Wednesday for the president’s description of a federal judge who ruled against his asylum policy as ‘an Obama judge,’” and that “[w]ithin hours, the president fired back on Twitter, launching an unusual conflict between the executive and judicial branches.” At AP, Mark Sherman reports that “[b]efore now, it has been highly unusual for a president to single out judges for personal criticism[, a]nd a chief justice’s challenge to a president’s comments is downright unprecedented in modern times.” Jess Bravin reports for The Wall Street Journal that “[f]ollowing previous presidential attacks on the judiciary, Chief Justice Roberts has remained publicly silent.” Additional coverage of the back-and-forth comes from Adam Liptak for The New York Times, Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Matthew Choi at Politico, Lyle Denniston at Constitution Daily, Lydia Wheeler at The Hill, John Bowden, also at The Hill, Pete Williams at NBC News, Jonathan Allen, also at NBC News, and Vanessa Romo at NPR. For The Washington Post, Fred Barbash writes that “[a]s unusual as Roberts’s comments were, he could have said so much more.”

Briefly:

We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up.  If you have or know of a recent (published in the last two or three days) article, post, podcast, or op-ed relating to the Supreme Court that you’d like us to consider for inclusion in the round-up, please send it to roundup [at] scotusblog.com. Thank you!

Posted in: Round-up

CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY