Skip to content
TERM IN REVIEW

The 2024-25 term brought notable wins for the court’s conservative majority – and the Trump administration

By Amy Howe on July 2 at 12:35 pm

Even before the Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration on universal injunctions, the administration’s success in front of the court was one of the major stories of the term. The justices have granted many of the administration’s pleas for emergency relief in recent months, including in cases on removing protected status from some foreign nationals living in the U.S. and the deportation of noncitizens to third-party countries.

The Supreme Court of the United States is pictured in Washington, D.C.

(Adam Michael Szuscik via Unsplash)

EMERGENCY DOCKET

Trump administration urges the court to pause a ruling preventing it from firing Consumer Product Safety Commission members

By Amy Howe on July 2 at 3:45 pm

On Wednesday, the Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to temporarily stay a district court ruling ordering it to reinstate three members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission. According to the government, the district court’s order “has sown chaos and dysfunction” at the CPSC.

RELIST WATCH

Off the field, off the rails, and off on vacation: The final relists of October Term 2024

By John Elwood on July 1 at 3:52 pm

As the justices prepare to close the books on October Term 2024, one last batch of high-stakes cases needs to be resolved: three transgender sports bans vying for review; a parental-consent abortion case; a cluster of sovereign immunity cases; still more confusion about Heck v. Humphrey; a death-row habeas case; and a $47 million copyright case that might hitch a ride behind Cox Communications.

TERM IN REVIEW

When inclusion becomes compulsion: Mahmoud v. Taylor, pluralism, and public education

By Asma Uddin on July 1 at 1:16 pm

Mahmoud v. Taylor upheld the rights of religious parents to opt their young children out of mandatory LGBTQ+-inclusive lessons. While some may see it as a conservative win, the ruling is better understood as a defense of constitutional safeguards for parental conscience, emphasizing the need for meaningful accommodations when public schools deliver moral instruction without allowing dissent.

Newsletter Sign Up

Receive email updates, legal news, and original reporting from SCOTUSblog and The Dispatch.

More news

WHAT WE’RE READING

The morning read for Thursday, July 3

By Zachary Shemtob on July 3, 2025

Yesterday, July 2, Amy and I were on the podcast Advisory Opinions. Please check out the episode here.

Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Thursday morning read:

TERM IN REVIEW

Trump v. CASA and the future of the universal injunction

By Mila Sohoni on July 2, 2025

This is part of SCOTUSblog’s term in review series, in which scholars analyze some of the most significant cases of the 2024-25 Supreme Court term.

The best that can be said for Trump v. CASA is that it could have been far worse. Its methodology and conclusions are myopic and wrong, and it is especially unwelcome during a period in which each passing day seems to bring new incursions by the executive branch upon individual rights, the separation of powers, federalism, and the rule of law. The court held that federal courts may not give universal injunctions, which are orders that block the application of a law or an executive branch action to anyone who might be harmed by it, not just its application to the plaintiffs. But despite the court’s seemingly categorical rejection of the universal injunction, the ironic possibility exists that the decision will turn out to be, as Justice Samuel Alito put it, essentially “academic.”  

Continue Reading
WHAT WE’RE READING

The morning read for Wednesday, July 2

By Zachary Shemtob on July 2, 2025
COURTLY OBSERVATIONS

By the numbers

By Erwin Chemerinsky on July 1, 2025

Courtly Observations is a recurring series by Erwin Chemerinsky that focuses on what the Supreme Court’s decisions will mean for the law, for lawyers and lower courts, and for people’s lives.

As someone who grew up (and continues to be) obsessed with baseball statistics, I think that a great deal can be learned from looking at the numbers concerning the Supreme Court (and SCOTUSblog does as well, as reflected in its 2024-25 Stat Pack). And now that the court has completed issuing decisions other than emergency matters, it is possible to study the statistics for October Term 2024.

Continue Reading
WHAT WE’RE READING

The morning read for Tuesday, July 1

By Zachary Shemtob on July 1, 2025

If you haven’t already, please check out our SCOTUSblog Stat Pack for the 2024-25 term, which can be found here.

Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Tuesday morning read: