Skip to main content

United States v. Wurie

Docket No.13-212
Op. Below1st Cir.
ArgumentApr 29, 2014

Holding

The police generally may not, without a warrant, search digital information on a cellphone seized from an individual who has been arrested.

Judgment

Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by John Roberts on Jun 25, 2014. Justice Alito filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.

Proceedings & orders timeline

Aug 15, 2013
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 16, 2013)
Sep 6, 2013
Order extending time to file response to petition to and including October 16, 2013.
Oct 8, 2013
Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including November 15, 2013.
Nov 15, 2013
Brief of respondent Brima Wurie in opposition filed.
Nov 15, 2013
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Brima Wurie.
Nov 20, 2013
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 6, 2013.
Nov 20, 2013
Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)
Dec 31, 2013
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 17, 2014.
Jan 17, 2014
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
Jan 17, 2014
Petition GRANTED.
Feb 11, 2014
SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, April 29, 2014
Feb 21, 2014
Record received from U.S.C.A. 1st Circuit, (1 envelope) part of this record is SEALED. All other filings of this record is available electronically through PACER.
Mar 3, 2014
Joint appendix filed.
Mar 3, 2014
Brief of petitioner United States filed.
Mar 5, 2014
Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from the respondent.
Mar 6, 2014
Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.
Mar 7, 2014
Brief amici curiae of Criminal Law Professors in support of private parties filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Mar 10, 2014
CIRCULATED.
Mar 10, 2014
Brief amici curiae of Center for Democracy & Technology, and Electronic Frontier Foundation in support of Riley and Wurie filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Mar 10, 2014
Brief amici curiae of American Library Association, and The Internet Archive in support of Riley and Wurie filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Mar 10, 2014
Brief amici curiae of National Press Photographers Association, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Mar 10, 2014
Brief amici curiae of Professors Charles E. MacLean & Adam Lamparello filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Mar 10, 2014
Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center in support of Riley and Wurie filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Apr 2, 2014
Brief of respondent Brima Wurie filed. (Distributed)
Apr 9, 2014
Brief amici curiae of National Association of Federal Defenders, et al., filed. (Distributed).
Apr 9, 2014
Brief amici curiae of Downsize DC Foundation, et al., filed. (Distributed).
Apr 9, 2014
Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed. (Distributed)
Apr 9, 2014
Brief amici curiae of Southwestern Law Student Anna Aran, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Apr 9, 2014
Brief amicus curiae of The Rutherford Institute filed. (Distributed)
Apr 22, 2014
Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)
Apr 29, 2014
Argued. For petitioner: Michael R. Dreeben, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Judith H. Mizner, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Boston, Mass.
Jun 25, 2014
Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. VIDED with No. 13-132.
Jul 28, 2014
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
Jul 28, 2014
Record returned for U.S.C.A. for First Circuit.

Welcome to SCOTUSblog

Tell us a bit about yourself so we can tailor what you see. You can update these any time in your account.