Editor's Note :

Editor's Note :

This week the blog will publish a multi-part online symposium on United States v. Texas, a challenge by Texas and twenty-five states to the Obama administration's deferred-action policy for immigration. Contributions to this special feature, as well as an “explainer” by this blog's Lyle Denniston, are available here.

Samica Enterprises, LLC v. Mail Boxes Etc., Inc.

Petition for certiorari denied on October 1, 2012
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
11-1322 9th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2012

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. represents the petitioners in this case.

Issue: Whether the Court should grant, vacate, and remand the federal court's decision below in light of the intervening state court decision which, on materially identical claims, rejected the interpretation of state law that was the basis of the federal district court’s decision.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Certiorari-stage documents

 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards