Skip to main content

Overton v. United States

Consolidated with Turner v. United States (15-1503)
Docket No.15-1504
Op. BelowD.C.
ArgumentMar 29, 2017
Vote6-2

Holding

The withheld evidence is not material under Brady v. Maryland.

Judgment

Affirmed, 6-2, in an opinion by Stephen G. Breyer on Jun 22, 2017. Justice Kagan filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Ginsburg joined. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Proceedings & orders timeline

Mar 23, 2016
Application (15A988) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 13, 2016 to May 13, 2016, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Mar 24, 2016
Application (15A988) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until May 13, 2016.
Apr 27, 2016
Application (15A988) to extend further the time from May 13, 2016 to June 10, 2016, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Apr 27, 2016
Application (15A988) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until June 10, 2016.
Jun 10, 2016
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 14, 2016)
Jul 7, 2016
Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 15, 2016.
Aug 11, 2016
Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including September 14, 2016.
Sep 8, 2016
Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including October 14, 2016.
Oct 14, 2016
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. VIDED.
Nov 1, 2016
Reply of petitioner Russell L. Overton filed.
Nov 2, 2016
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 22, 2016.
Nov 16, 2016
Record Requested .
Nov 18, 2016
Record received from the D.C. Court of Appeals. The record is electronic.
Nov 21, 2016
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 9, 2016.
Dec 14, 2016
Petition GRANTED limited to the following question: "Whether the petitioners' convictions must be set aside under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)." The petition in 15-1503 is granted and the cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.
Jan 24, 2017
Joint motion to deem the court of appeals' joint appendix as supplemental volumes to the joint appendix filed with this Court filed. VIDED.
Jan 27, 2017
Brief of petitioner Russell L. Overton filed.
Jan 27, 2017
Joint appendix filed. VIDED.
Feb 3, 2017
SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, March 29, 2017. VIDED
Feb 3, 2017
Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed. VIDED.
Feb 3, 2017
Brief amicus curiae of Center on Wrongful Convictions of Youth filed. VIDED.
Feb 3, 2017
Brief amici curiae of Texas Public Policy Foundation, et al. filed. VIDED.
Feb 3, 2017
Brief amici curiae of Former Prosecutors filed. VIDED.
Feb 3, 2017
Brief amicus curiae of Wilfredo Lora filed. VIDED.
Feb 3, 2017
Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed. VIDED.
Feb 7, 2017
Application (16A792) to file a consolidated respondents brief on the merits in excess of word limits, submitted to The Chief Justice. VIDED.
Feb 9, 2017
Application (16A792) to file a consolidated respondents brief on the merits in excess of word limits granted by The Chief Justice. The consolidated brief on the merits may not exceed 22,500 words. VIDED.
Feb 21, 2017
Motion to deem the court of appeals' joint appendix as supplemental volumes to the joint appendix filed with this Court GRANTED. VIDED.
Feb 22, 2017
CIRCULATED.
Feb 27, 2017
Brief of respondent United States filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Mar 1, 2017
Motion for divided argument filed by petitioner Russell L. Overton. VIDED.
Mar 17, 2017
Motion for divided argument filed by petitioner GRANTED.
Mar 17, 2017
Reply of petitioners Charles S. Turner, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Mar 21, 2017
Reply of petitioner Russell L. Overton filed. (Distributed)
Mar 29, 2017
Argued. For petitioners in 15-1503: John S. Williams, Washington, D. C. For petitioner in 15-1504: Deanna M. Rice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Michael R. Dreeben, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. VIDED.
Jun 22, 2017
Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Breyer, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Thomas, Alito, and Sotomayor, JJ., joined. Kagan, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Ginsburg, J., joined. Gorsuch, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the cases. VIDED.

Welcome to SCOTUSblog

Tell us a bit about yourself so we can tailor what you see. You can update these any time in your account.