Garza v. Idaho

Pending petition
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
17-1026 Idaho TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Issue: Whether the “presumption of prejudice” recognized in Roe v. Flores-Ortega applies where a criminal defendant instructs his trial counsel to file a notice of appeal but trial counsel decides not to do so because the defendant’s plea agreement included an appeal waiver.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders
Jan 23 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 23, 2018)
Feb 21 2018Waiver of right of respondent State of Idaho to respond filed.
Feb 22 2018Brief amicus curiae of The Ethics Bureau at Yale filed.
Feb 22 2018Brief amicus curiae of Idaho Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.
Mar 07 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/23/2018.
Mar 08 2018Response Requested. (Due April 9, 2018)
Mar 16 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 9, 2018 to June 8, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
Mar 16 2018Response to motion to extend the time to file a response from petitioner Gilberto Garza, Jr. filed.
Mar 20 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part, and the time is extended to and including May 15, 2018.
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards