Details on this morning’s orders
This morning, the Court issued orders from the Justices' December 3 Conference, granting certiorari in two cases. Today's full order list is here.
The following cases were granted this morning:
American Electric Power Co., Inc. v. Connecticut (Granted )
Docket: 10-174
Issue(s): (1) Whether states and private parties may seek emissions caps on utilities for their alleged contribution to global climate change; (2) whether a cause of action to cap carbon dioxide emissions can be implied under federal common law; and (3) whether claims seeking to cap carbon dioxide emissions based on a court's weighing of the potential risks of climate change against the socioeconomic utility of defendants' conduct would be governed by “judicially discoverable and manageable standards†or could be resolved without “initial policy determination[s] of a kind clearly for nonjudicial discretion.†(Sotomayor, J., recused.)
Certiorari stage documents:
- Opinion below (2d Circuit)
- Opinion below (2d Circuit)
- Petition for certiorari
- Brief in opposition (unavailable)
- Petitioners' reply (unavailable)
- Amicus brief for Unions for Jobs and the Environment (unavailable)
- Amicus brief for the Pacific Legal Foundation (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of the Association of International Automobile Manufacturers, et al. (unavailable)
- Amicus brief for NATSO, Inc. (unavailable)
- Amicus brief for the American Chemistry Council, et al. (unavailable)
- Amicus brief for the National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center, et al. (unavailable)
- Amicus brief for the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence
- Amicus brief for the Chamber of Commerce (unavailable)
- Amicus brief for the Edison Electric Institute, et al. (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of the American Farm Bureau Federation, et al. (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of law professors (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of states (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of the Cato Institute (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of the Mountain States Legal Foundation (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of the states of Indiana et al. (unavailable)
- Brief of respondent Tennessee Valley Authority (unavailable)
NOTE: In the following case, the Court limited its grant of certiorari to question 1 of the questions presented, and directed the parties to brief an additional question (listed below as question 2):
Wal-Mart v. Dukes (Granted )
Docket: 10-277
Issue(s): (1) Whether claims for monetary relief can be certified under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) and, if so, under what circumstances; and (2) whether the class certification ordered under rule 23(b)(2) was consistent with rule 23(a).
Certiorari stage documents:
- Opinion below (9th Circuit)
- Petition for certiorari (unavailable)
- Brief in opposition (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of Intel (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of the Defense Bar (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of Retail Litigation Center, Inc. (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of Altria Group et al. (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of the Equal Employment Advisory Council (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of Pacific Legal Foundation (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of Washington Legal Foundation (unavailable)
- Amicus brief of California Employment Law Council (unavailable)
- Petitioner's reply (unavailable)
The Court did not call for the views of the Acting Solicitor General on any pending petitions this morning.
Also of note, Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ginsburg, dissented from the Court’s denial of certiorari this morning in Williams v. Hobbs (09-10382).
Recommended Citation: Anna Christensen, Details on this morning’s orders, SCOTUSblog (Dec. 6, 2010, 10:37 AM), http://www.scotusblog.com/2010/12/details-on-this-mornings-orders-2/





