A challenge to approximately 127,000 ballots cast at drive-through voting sites in Harris County, Texas, could be moving quickly through the federal courts in the run-up to the election. The county, which is both the largest in the state and has a high number of Democratic voters, responded to the coronavirus pandemic by creating 10 drive-through voting sites.
Republicans went to federal court, arguing that votes cast using the drive-through sites should be tossed out because the Harris County clerk did not have the power to order drive-through voting.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen rejected the Republicans’ request on Nov. 2. He ruled that the Republicans lacked a legal right to sue, known as standing. But even if they had standing, Hanen added, he still would deny the request on the merits.
Shortly after Hanen issued his decision, Republicans appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit.
They sought an emergency order blocking Harris County from using drive-through voting on Election Day. The 5th Circuit rejected the request. The Harris County clerk also announced that he would close nine of the county’s 10 drive-through sites on Election Day as a precautionary measure, to ensure that votes cast on Election Day would be counted. (The clerk, Chris Hollins, suggested that the 10th site, in the garage at the arena used by the Houston Rockets, could survive a post-election challenge because it was “unquestionably a suitable location for Election Day voting.”)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
October 27, 2020 | Petition for writ of mandamus to invalidate drive-through votes filed by Steven Hotze, et al., in Texas Supreme Court |
October 28, 2020 | Complaint filed by Steven Hotze, et al., in federal district court |
November 1, 2020 | Opposition brief filed by Scott Harris, clerk of Harris County, in federal district court |
November 1, 2020 | Order denying writ of mandamus issued by Texas Supreme Court |
November 2, 2020 | Order dismissing suit for lack of standing issued by district court |
November 2, 2020 | Application for injunction of district court ruling filed by Steven Hotze, et al., in 5th Circuit |
November 2, 2020 | Brief opposing application for injunction filed by Chris Hollins in 5th Circuit |
November 3, 2020 | Order denying application for injunction issued by 5th Circuit |
NEW: The Supreme Court DECLINES a request from red states seeking to block a Biden policy that directs the government to assess the societal costs of greenhouse gases. The administration can implement the policy for now. No public dissents from the court's one-sentence order.
The Supreme Court rules 6-3 against two men on Arizona's death row who say they received ineffective assistance of counsel in state court. SCOTUS says that federal courts reviewing their cases can't hold evidentiary hearings to fully assess their ineffective-counsel claims.
In a dispute over arbitration rights, the Supreme Court unanimously sides with a Taco Bell worker who sued the franchise owner for wage violations. The dispute involved whether the company waited too long to try to move the lawsuit out of court and into arbitration.
The Supreme Court adds no new cases to its docket in this morning's order list. Stephen Breyer writes a brief statement regarding the court's denial of review in a capital case; he reiterates his doubts about the constitutionality of the death penalty. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/052322zor_p86a.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT, followed by opinions starting at 10. You know the drill: We'll be firing up our live blog and breaking it all down. See you there.
Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, May 23 - SCOTUSblog
On Monday, May 23, we will be live blogging as the court releases orders from the May 19 conference and opinio...
www.scotusblog.com