Skip to content

Wimbley v. Alabama

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
15-7939 Ala. Crim. App. Not Argued May 31, 2016 8-0 Per Curiam OT 2015

Issue: (1) Whether, under Miranda v. Arizona and Edwards v. Arizona, law enforcement officers are permitted to interrogate a defendant after he invokes his right to counsel, is placed in a jail cell that does not have adequate water and light, is held there without counsel for four days and then contacts officers to discuss the conditions of his confinement; and (2) whether this Court's decision in Hurst v. Florida invalidates a death sentence that is based on a judge's independent findings that aggravating circumstances existed and that they outweighed mitigating circumstances, rather than a jury verdict.

Judgment: Vacated and remanded in a per curiam opinion on May 31, 2016.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
12/11/2015Application (15A626) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 24, 2015 to January 28, 2016, submitted to Justice Thomas.
12/16/2015Application (15A626) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until January 28, 2016.
01/28/2016Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 3, 2016)
02/09/2016Order extending time to file response to petition to and including April 4, 2016.
04/04/2016Brief of respondent Alabama in opposition filed.
04/20/2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 12, 2016.
04/26/2016Record Requested .
05/10/2016Record received from the Court of Criminal Appeals for the State of Alabama. The record is electronic.
05/11/2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 26, 2016.
05/31/2016Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Hurst v. Florida, 577 U. S. ___ (2016).
07/05/2016MANDATE ISSUED
07/05/2016JUDGMENT ISSUED