Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corp.
Petition for certiorari denied on October 2, 2017
Issue: (1) Whether the inquiry under 35 U.S.C. § 101 requires courts to ignore the specification, as the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held, or whether courts should ascertain the true scope of the claims in light of the specification and intrinsic record in determining whether they are drawn to a patent-ineligible concept; and (2) whether an otherwise revolutionary technological breakthrough is not an "inventive concept" under the second step of Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International merely because the court believed the breakthrough could theoretically be implemented without a computer.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Aurora Barnes, July 4, 2017)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
03/13/2017 | Application (16A892) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 28, 2017 to April 27, 2017, submitted to The Chief Justice. |
03/15/2017 | Application (16A892) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until April 27, 2017. |
04/27/2017 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 30, 2017) |
05/30/2017 | Brief of respondent Mentor Graphics Corporation in opposition filed. |
05/30/2017 | Brief amicus curiae of The Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago in support of neither party filed. |
06/13/2017 | Reply of petitioner Synopsys, Inc. filed. |
06/14/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 25, 2017. |
09/22/2017 | Supplemental brief of petitioner Synopsys, Inc. filed. (Distributed) |
10/02/2017 | Petition DENIED. |