Skip to content

Neven v. Wentzell

Petition for certiorari denied on May 13, 2013

Docket No. Op. BelowArgument Opinion Vote Author Term
12-352 9th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2012

Issue: Whether, when a petitioner has previously challenged his judgement of conviction in a federal habeas action, the vacation by a state court of one of multiple counts of that judgement, which results in no resentencing or change to the sentences of the remaining counts, constitutes a new judgement for the purposes of the rules governing the filing of successive habeas petitions.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
09/18/2012Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 22, 2012)
11/05/2012DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 20, 2012.
11/13/2012Response Requested . (Due December 13, 2012)
12/04/2012Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 11, 2013.
01/03/2013Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including February 11, 2013.
02/04/2013Brief of respondent Christopher Noel Wentzell in opposition filed.
02/04/2013Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Christopher Noel Wentzell.
02/20/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 15, 2013.
04/23/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 9, 2013.
05/13/2013Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
05/13/2013Petition DENIED.