McCray v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company
Petition for certiorari denied on February 19, 2013
Issue: Whether the filed-rate doctrine exempts a cartel from from federal antitrust damages liability for price-fixed rates filed with a state agency, given (a) there is no meaningful review of the filed rates by the agency, (b) the agency is unable to award retrospective compensatory relief for the unlawful conduct, and (c) the private cartel price-fixing would not be exempt under the state action doctrine due to lack of "active supervision" by the agency.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Mary Pat Dwyer, February 9, 2013)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 10/25/2012 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 28, 2012) |
| 11/14/2012 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 14, 2013. |
| 11/28/2012 | Brief amici curiae of Antitrust and Economics Professors, and American Antitrust Institute filed. |
| 11/28/2012 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Public Citizen, Inc. |
| 01/14/2013 | Brief of respondents Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, et al. in opposition filed. |
| 01/28/2013 | Reply of petitioners Dawn A. McCray, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| 01/30/2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013. |
| 02/19/2013 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Public Citizen, Inc. GRANTED. |
| 02/19/2013 | Petition DENIED. |