Skip to content

Maryland v. Kulbicki

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
14-848 Md. Not Argued Oct 5, 2015 n/a Per Curiam OT 2015

Holding: An appellate court violates the core principles of Strickland v. Washington when it conducts a post-hoc assessment of trial counsel"s performance based on scientific advances not available at the time of trial.

Judgment: Reversed in a per curiam opinion on October 5, 2015.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
01/16/2015Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 17, 2015)
02/06/2015Waiver of right of respondent James Kulbicki to respond filed.
02/18/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 6, 2015.
02/19/2015Response Requested . (Due March 23, 2015)
03/10/2015Order extending time to file response to petition to and including April 22, 2015.
04/20/2015Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including May 6, 2015.
05/06/2015Brief of respondent James Kulbicki in opposition filed.
05/26/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 11, 2015.
06/15/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 18, 2015.
06/22/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 25, 2015.
06/25/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 29, 2015.
09/21/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 28, 2015.
10/05/2015Petition GRANTED. Judgment REVERSED. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion)
11/06/2015MANDATE ISSUED.