Lee v. Clinard
Petition for certiorari denied on October 1, 2018
Issue: (1) Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit"s holding that the state court"s prejudice determination constituted an unreasonable application of Strickland v. Washington contravened the Supreme Court"s precedents instructing that federal habeas review of ineffective-assistance claims must be "doubly deferential"; and (2) whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit"s decision to allow the federal district court to conduct a new transfer hearing on remand, instead of first allowing the state court an opportunity to remedy the alleged constitutional violation, conflicts with the Supreme Court"s precedents.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
05/29/2018 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 2, 2018) |
06/19/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 2, 2018 to August 1, 2018, submitted to The Clerk. |
06/21/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 1, 2018. |
07/23/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 1, 2018 to August 15, 2018, submitted to The Clerk. |
07/24/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 15, 2018. |
08/15/2018 | Brief of respondent Jason Clinard in opposition filed. |
08/29/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018. |
08/29/2018 | Reply of petitioner Randy Lee filed. (Distributed) |
10/01/2018 | Petition DENIED. |