Does v. Mills
Application for injunctive relief denied on October 29, 2021
Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should issue an injunction to prevent Maine from enforcing a COVID-19 vaccine mandate for health care workers that lacks religious exemptions.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Court turns away religious challenge to Maines vaccine mandate for health care workers (James Romoser, October 30, 2021)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
10/20/2021 | Application (21A90) for injunctive relief, submitted to Justice Breyer. |
10/20/2021 | Response to application (21A90) requested by Justice Breyer, due Monday, October 25, by noon. |
10/22/2021 | Motion for leave to file amici brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by religious and civil rights organizations. |
10/25/2021 | Response to application from respondents MaineHealth, et al. filed. |
10/25/2021 | Response to application from respondents Janet T. Mills, et al. filed. |
10/25/2021 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty. |
10/27/2021 | Reply of applicants John Does 1-3, et al. filed. |
10/28/2021 | Motion for leave to file amici brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by Public Health Associates and Scholars. |
10/29/2021 | Application (21A90) referred to the Court. |
10/29/2021 | Application (21A90) denied by the Court. The application for injunctive relief presented to JUSTICE BREYER and by him referred to the Court is denied. JUSTICE BARRETT, with whom JUSTICE KAVANAUGH joins, concurring in the denial of application for injunctive relief. (Detached Opinion). JUSTICE GORSUCH, with whom JUSTICE THOMAS and JUSTICE ALITO join, dissenting from the denial of application for injunctive relief. (Detached Opinion). |