Skip to content

Baker v. Turner

Petition for certiorari denied on October 7, 2019

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
18-1320 9th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2019

Issue: (1) Whether an amended judgment of conviction containing only nominal changes"that does not disturb the original conviction and sentence"should be considered a new judgment that renews a state inmate"s ability to challenge his conviction and sentence; and (2) whether, if a new judgment of conviction is entered, a petitioner who already sought federal habeas relief must obtain authorization to file a second or successive petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b), in order to challenge undisturbed elements of the original judgment.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
04/15/2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 20, 2019)
05/09/2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 20, 2019 to June 7, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
05/15/2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 7, 2019.
05/17/2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 7, 2019 to June 19, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
05/22/2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including June 19, 2019.
06/19/2019Brief of respondent Alquandre H. Turner in opposition filed.
06/28/2019Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Alquandre H. Turner.
07/03/2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
07/03/2019Reply of petitioner Renee Baker, et al. filed. (Distributed)
10/07/2019Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
10/07/2019Petition DENIED.