Baker v. Turner
Petition for certiorari denied on October 7, 2019
Issue: (1) Whether an amended judgment of conviction containing only nominal changes"that does not disturb the original conviction and sentence"should be considered a new judgment that renews a state inmate"s ability to challenge his conviction and sentence; and (2) whether, if a new judgment of conviction is entered, a petitioner who already sought federal habeas relief must obtain authorization to file a second or successive petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b), in order to challenge undisturbed elements of the original judgment.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
04/15/2019 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 20, 2019) |
05/09/2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 20, 2019 to June 7, 2019, submitted to The Clerk. |
05/15/2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 7, 2019. |
05/17/2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 7, 2019 to June 19, 2019, submitted to The Clerk. |
05/22/2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including June 19, 2019. |
06/19/2019 | Brief of respondent Alquandre H. Turner in opposition filed. |
06/28/2019 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Alquandre H. Turner. |
07/03/2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019. |
07/03/2019 | Reply of petitioner Renee Baker, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
10/07/2019 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. |
10/07/2019 | Petition DENIED. |