Arizona v. Bahr
Petition for certiorari denied on January 8, 2018
Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit erred in holding, in conflict with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, that the Environmental Protection Agency's interpretation of the Clean Air Act's contingency measures provision, 42 U.S.C. § 7502(c)(9), was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion or otherwise not in accordance with the law.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Aurora Barnes, September 6, 2017)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
03/07/2017 | Application (16A885) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 9, 2017 to May 10, 2017, submitted to Justice Kennedy. |
03/10/2017 | Application (16A885) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until May 10, 2017. |
05/10/2017 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 15, 2017) |
05/22/2017 | Waiver of right of respondents Sandra L. Bahr, et al. to respond filed. |
06/09/2017 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including July 17, 2017. |
06/15/2017 | Brief amici curiae of South Coast Air Quality Management District, et al. filed. |
07/13/2017 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including August 29, 2017. |
08/29/2017 | Brief of Federal Respondents in opposition filed. |
09/08/2017 | Reply of petitioner Arizona filed. |
09/13/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2017. |
09/26/2017 | Response Requested. (Due October 26, 2017) |
10/12/2017 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 30, 2017. |
11/30/2017 | Brief of respondents Sandra L. Bahr, et al. in opposition filed. |
12/18/2017 | Reply of petitioner Arizona filed. |
12/20/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2018. |
01/08/2018 | Petition DENIED. |