|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-1230||7th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether a search-warrant application that fails to provide any particularized nexus between an individual’s alleged drug-trafficking activity and the individual’s residence can provide probable cause for a warrant to search the residence.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Feb 08 2019||Application (18A821) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 18, 2019 to March 21, 2019, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.|
|Feb 08 2019||Application (18A821) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until March 21, 2019.|
|Mar 21 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 22, 2019)|
|Apr 16 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 22, 2019 to May 22, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 17 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 22, 2019.|
|May 09 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 22, 2019 to June 21, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|May 10 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including June 21, 2019.|
|Jun 03 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 21, 2019 to July 8, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jun 05 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including July 8, 2019.|
|Jul 08 2019||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Jul 24 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.|
|Jul 26 2019||Reply of petitioner Juan Zamudio filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 07 2019||Petition DENIED.|
Bill Cosby’s prosecutors asked the Supreme Court to reinstate his conviction today. Quick explainer.
In our latest episode of SCOTUStalk, @shefalil of @19thnews joined us to preview Wednesday's argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health. Shefali explains the current state of abortion access and the case's implications in Mississippi and across America.
Roe, Dobbs, and the current state of abortion access - SCOTUSblog
In advance of Wednesday's oral argument in the momentous abortion case, Shefali Luthra, a gender and health care r...
Update: Without calling for a response or referring the case to the full court, Justice Breyer just rejected last week's challenge from Massachusetts hospital workers who object to the hospital's COVID vaccine mandate.
(Breyer handles emergency requests from Massachusetts.)
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket challenge to a COVID vaccine mandate. This one is from employees at Mass General Brigham who say the Boston-based hospital violated federal law by not granting them exemptions from the hospital's vaccine policy. Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/21A175.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral argument in a case about Medicare payments to hospitals that serve low-income patients. Lots of money at stake, plus potential implications for the Chevron doctrine. @JACoganJr explains the case:
Money for safety-net hospitals at stake in dispute over Medicare payment formula - SCOTUSblog
When it comes to highlighting the complexity of the Medicare Act and its hospital payment rules, Becerra v. Empire...
Two days from now, SCOTUS will hear the biggest abortion case in a generation. In a battle over a Mississippi law, abortion opponents are asking the court to end the constitutional right to abortion. Here's our preview of the case, via @AHoweBlogger.
Roe v. Wade hangs in balance as reshaped court prepares to hear biggest abortion case in decades - SCOTUSblog
When he ran for president in 2016, then-candidate Donald Trump promised to nominate Supreme Court justices who would...
JUST IN: One new cert grant this morning: Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP. More on the case here: https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/berger-v-north-carolina-state-conference-of-the-naacp/
#SCOTUS adds one new case to its merits docket this morning: Berger v. NC Conference of NAACP, in which the justices will weigh in on an effort by Republican legislators in the state to intervene to defend the state’s voter-ID law. Here's the order: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112421zr_7li8.pdf