|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|13-7451||11th Cir.||Nov 5, 2014||Feb 25, 2015||5-4||Ginsburg||OT 2014|
Holding: For purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 1519, which imposes criminal liability on anyone who “knowingly . . . destroys . . . any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States,” a “tangible object” is one used to record or preserve information.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on February 25, 2015. Justice Alito filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Justice Kagan filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 13 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 20, 2013)|
|Nov 26 2013||Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.|
|Dec 5 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 10, 2014.|
|Jan 6 2014||Response Requested . (Due February 5, 2014)|
|Jan 28 2014||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including March 7, 2014.|
|Feb 5 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Cause of Action filed.|
|Feb 5 2014||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.|
|Mar 5 2014||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including March 14, 2014.|
|Mar 14 2014||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Mar 28 2014||Reply of petitioner John L. Yates filed.|
|Apr 3 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 18, 2014.|
|Apr 21 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 25, 2014.|
|Apr 28 2014||Motion to proceed in forma pauperis Granted. Petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.|
|May 15 2014||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including June 30, 2014.|
|May 15 2014||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 19, 2014.|
|May 28 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Jun 30 2014||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)|
|Jun 30 2014||Brief of petitioner John L. Yates filed.|
|Jul 3 2014||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America & National Association of Manufacturers filed.|
|Jul 7 2014||Brief amici curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. filed.|
|Jul 7 2014||Brief amici curiae of Eighteen Criminal Law Professors filed.|
|Jul 7 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.|
|Jul 7 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.|
|Jul 7 2014||Brief amici curiae of Cause of Action, et al. filed.|
|Jul 7 2014||Brief amicus curiae of National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center filed.|
|Jul 7 2014||Brief amicus curiae of The Honorable Michael Oxley filed.|
|Jul 7 2014||Brief amici curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation, et al. filed.|
|Aug 19 2014||Brief of respondent United States filed.|
|Sep 4 2014||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, November 5, 2014.|
|Sep 8 2014||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 11th Circuit.|
|Sep 8 2014||Record received from U.S.C.A 11th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Sep 18 2014||Reply of petitioner John L. Yates filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 19 2014||CIRCULATED|
|Nov 5 2014||Argued. For petitioner: John L. Badalamenti, Assistant Federal Defender, Tampa, Fla. For respondent: Roman Martinez, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Nov 5 2014||Letter from the Solicitor General filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 25 2015||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Ginsburg, J., announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion, in which Roberts, C. J., and Breyer and Sotomayor, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Kagan, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas, JJ., joined.|
|Mar 30 2015||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.