West Linn Corporate Park, L.L.C. v. City of West Linn

Issue: (1) Whether the “essential nexus” and “rough proportionality” requirements of Nollan v. California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. City of Tigard (1994) apply equally to the exactions of personal property as they do to exactions of real property; and (2) whether the court below misconstrued this Court’s decision in Lingle v. Chevron USA Inc. when it refused to apply the protection of the Fifth Amendment to an exaction of personal property.

Briefs and Documents

Certiorari-stage documents

• Opinion below (9th Cir.)
• Petition for certiorari
• Brief in opposition
• Amicus brief of Pacific Legal Foundation
• Amicus brief of New England Legal Foundation (forthcoming)
• Amicus brief of National Association of Home Builders (forthcoming)
• Petitioner's reply
• Supplemental brief of petitioner (forthcoming)