|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|13-935||7th Cir.||Jan 14, 2015||May 26, 2015||6-3||Sotomayor||OT 2014|
Holding: Article III permits bankruptcy judges to adjudicate Stern claims with the parties’ knowing and voluntary consent.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor on May 26, 2015. Justice Alito filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgement. Chief Justice Roberts filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Scalia joined and in which Justice Thomas joined as to Part I. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 20 2013||Application (13A648) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 5, 2014 to February 5, 2014, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Dec 20 2013||Application (13A648) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until February 5, 2014.|
|Feb 5 2014||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 7, 2014)|
|Mar 7 2014||Brief of respondent Richard Sharif in opposition filed.|
|Mar 21 2014||Reply of petitioners Wellness International Network, Limited, et al. filed.|
|Mar 26 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 18, 2014.|
|Jun 9 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 12, 2014.|
|Jun 16 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 19, 2014.|
|Jun 23 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 26, 2014.|
|Jun 30 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 30, 2014.|
|Jul 1 2014||Petition GRANTED limited to Questions 1 and 3 presented by the petition.|
|Jul 14 2014||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including September 9, 2014.|
|Jul 14 2014||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including November 19, 2014.|
|Sep 9 2014||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)|
|Sep 9 2014||Brief of petitioners Wellness International Network, Limited, et al. filed.|
|Sep 9 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or neither party from counsel for the respondent.|
|Sep 11 2014||Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed.|
|Sep 16 2014||Brief amicus curiae of American College of Bankruptcy filed.|
|Sep 16 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Business Law Section of the Florida Bar in support of neither party filed.|
|Sep 16 2014||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Bankruptcy Trustees filed.|
|Sep 16 2014||Brief amicus curiae of G. Eric Brunstad, Jr. filed.|
|Sep 16 2014||Brief amicus curiae of American Bar Association filed.|
|Nov 7 2014||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Nov 19 2014||Brief of respondent Richard Sharif filed.|
|Nov 19 2014||Supplemental appendix of respondent filed.|
|Nov 21 2014||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, January 14, 2015.|
|Nov 26 2014||Brief amici curiae of Certain TOUSA Defendants filed.|
|Dec 2 2014||CIRCULATED.|
|Dec 2 2014||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 7th Circuit.|
|Dec 8 2014||Record received from U.S.C.A. is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Dec 8 2014||Record received from U.S.D.C. Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division is electronic.|
|Dec 15 2014||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Dec 19 2014||Reply of petitioners Wellness International Network, Limited, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 14 2015||Argued. For petitioners: Catherine Steege, Chicago, Ill.; and Curtis E. Gannon, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: Jonathan D. Hacker, Washington, D. C.|
|May 26 2015||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Kagan, JJ., joined, and in which Alito, J., joined in part. Alito, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Roberts, C. J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Scalia, J., joined, and in which Thomas, J., joined as to Part I. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion.|
|Jun 29 2015||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
We’ve gotten roughly half of the merits opinions for the term so far. Kavanaugh is trending as the median justice and appears to be supplanting Roberts.
Of course, that could all change by June. Here’s the first in a series on interim stats from the term.
On a new, conservative court, Kavanaugh sits at the center - SCOTUSblog
This article is the first in a series on interim statistics from the 2020-21 Supreme Court term. The Supreme Cou...
The Supreme Court will release orders and opinion(s?) on Monday May 17.
Order list at 9:30 a.m. EDT. Opinions at 10:00.
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.