|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-783||11th Cir.||Nov 30, 2020||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2020|
Issue: Whether a person who is authorized to access information on a computer for certain purposes violates Section 1030(a)(2) of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act if he accesses the same information for an improper purpose.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 18 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 17, 2020)|
|Jan 07 2020||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Nathan Van Buren.|
|Jan 10 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 17, 2020 to February 18, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 13 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 18, 2020.|
|Jan 17 2020||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.|
|Jan 17 2020||Brief amici curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation, et al. filed.|
|Jan 31 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 18, 2020 to March 10, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 31 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 10, 2020.|
|Mar 10 2020||Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.|
|Mar 18 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.|
|Mar 18 2020||Reply of petitioner Nathan Van Buren filed.|
|Apr 13 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.|
|Apr 20 2020||Petition GRANTED.|
|Apr 29 2020||Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.|
|May 06 2020||Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including July 1, 2020. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 27, 2020.|
|Jun 04 2020||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Nathan Van Buren|
|Jul 01 2020||Joint appendix filed.|
|Jul 01 2020||Brief of petitioner Nathan Van Buren filed.|
|Jul 07 2020||Brief amici curiae of The R Street Institute, et al. filed.|
|Jul 07 2020||Brief amici curiae of Kyratso Karahalios, et al. filed.|
|Jul 07 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Association of Medical Device Service Organizations filed.|
|Jul 07 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Association of Medical Device Reprocessors filed.|
|Jul 08 2020||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.|
|Jul 08 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Committee for Justice filed.|
|Jul 08 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Americans for Prosperity Foundation filed.|
|Jul 08 2020||Brief amici curiae of Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, et al. filed.|
|Jul 08 2020||Brief amici curiae of National Whistleblower Center filed.|
|Jul 08 2020||Brief amicus curiae of The United States Technology Policy Committee of the ACM in support of neither party filed.|
|Jul 08 2020||Brief amici curiae of Technology Companies filed.|
|Jul 08 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Orin S. Kerr filed.|
|Jul 08 2020||Brief amici curiae of Computer Security Researchers, et al. filed.|
|Jul 08 2020||Brief amicus curiae of The Markup filed.|
|Aug 27 2020||Brief of respondent United States filed.|
|Aug 31 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association filed.|
|Sep 01 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Managed Funds Association filed.|
|Sep 02 2020||Brief amici curiae of Karen Heart and Anthony Volini of CIPLIT filed.|
|Sep 03 2020||Brief amici curiae of Electronic Privacy Information Center, et al. filed.|
|Sep 03 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Voatz, Inc. filed.|
|Sep 03 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Digital Justice Foundation filed.|
|Sep 16 2020||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, November 30, 2020.|
|Sep 28 2020||Reply of petitioner Nathan Van Buren filed.|
|Oct 08 2020||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 11th Circuit.|
|Oct 13 2020||Record received from the U.S.C.A. 11th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Oct 27 2020||CIRCULATED|
|Nov 04 2020||Record received from the U.S.D.C Northern District of Georgia (Atlanta) Some sealed materials. One Envelope.|
|Nov 30 2020||Argued. For petitioner: Jeffrey L. Fisher, Stanford, Cal. For respondent: Eric J. Feigin, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
NEW: SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases. Here's the orders list. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/030121zor_m6hn.pdf
#SCOTUS grants US v. Vaello-Madero, a challenge to exclusion of Puerto Rico residents from eligibility for Supplemental Social Security Income program, which provides benefits to poor disabled adults & children
Good morning. It’s Monday, and it’s March!
At 9:30 a.m. EST, SCOTUS will release orders from Friday’s conference.
At 10:00, the court will consider an appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges. More from George Quillin & Jeanne Gills.
Justices to consider appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges - SCOTUSblog
The justices continue their light load for the February argument session next week. First up is Monday’s Unite...
BREAKING: SCOTUS orders California’s Santa Clara County to allow churches to hold indoor services. Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan dissent. Here’s the short shadow docket order.
#SCOTUS grants emergency request from northern California churches to allow indoor worship services pending appeal, says result is "clearly dictated" by recent decision. Kagan dissents, joined by Breyer & Sotomayor: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022621zr_1bo2.pdf
Just in: SCOTUS opinions expected next Thursday.
#SCOTUS website indicates that the Court will release orders from today's conference on Monday morning, March 1, at 9:30 am, with opinions again on Thursday, March 4, at 10 am. Justices will also hear oral arguments next week, including in Arizona voting dispute on Tuesday.
Apparently all the action today at #SCOTUS was not limited to opinion announcements at 10 am. Major new cert. petition filed today challenging Harvard admissions policy. https://twitter.com/GregStohr/status/1364962610177843210
NEW: Supreme Court asked to outlaw race-based college admissions. Group challenging Harvard admissions policy says it files appeal asking court to over 2003 Grutter decision.
SCOTUS rules against a college student who tried to sue police officers after they mistook him for a criminal suspect and tackled/beat him. The unanimous ruling involves a technical interpretation of the "judgment bar" under the Federal Tort Claims Act. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-546_7mip.pdf
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.