|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|13-212||1st Cir.||Jun 25, 2014||9-0||Roberts||OT 2013|
Holding: The police generally may not, without a warrant, search digital information on a cellphone seized from an individual who has been arrested.
Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on June 25, 2014. Justice Alito filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Aug 15 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 16, 2013)|
|Sep 6 2013||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including October 16, 2013.|
|Oct 8 2013||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including November 15, 2013.|
|Nov 15 2013||Brief of respondent Brima Wurie in opposition filed.|
|Nov 15 2013||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Brima Wurie.|
|Nov 20 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 6, 2013.|
|Nov 20 2013||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 31 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 17, 2014.|
|Jan 17 2014||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.|
|Jan 17 2014||Petition GRANTED.|
|Feb 11 2014||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, April 29, 2014|
|Feb 21 2014||Record received from U.S.C.A. 1st Circuit, (1 envelope) part of this record is SEALED. All other filings of this record is available electronically through PACER.|
|Mar 3 2014||Joint appendix filed.|
|Mar 3 2014||Brief of petitioner United States filed.|
|Mar 5 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from the respondent.|
|Mar 6 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Mar 7 2014||Brief amici curiae of Criminal Law Professors in support of private parties filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Mar 10 2014||CIRCULATED.|
|Mar 10 2014||Brief amici curiae of Center for Democracy & Technology, and Electronic Frontier Foundation in support of Riley and Wurie filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Mar 10 2014||Brief amici curiae of American Library Association, and The Internet Archive in support of Riley and Wurie filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Mar 10 2014||Brief amici curiae of National Press Photographers Association, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Mar 10 2014||Brief amici curiae of Professors Charles E. MacLean & Adam Lamparello filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Mar 10 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center in support of Riley and Wurie filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Apr 2 2014||Brief of respondent Brima Wurie filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 9 2014||Brief amici curiae of National Association of Federal Defenders, et al., filed. (Distributed).|
|Apr 9 2014||Brief amici curiae of Downsize DC Foundation, et al., filed. (Distributed).|
|Apr 9 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 9 2014||Brief amici curiae of Southwestern Law Student Anna Aran, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 9 2014||Brief amicus curiae of The Rutherford Institute filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 22 2014||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 29 2014||Argued. For petitioner: Michael R. Dreeben, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Judith H. Mizner, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Boston, Mass.|
|Jun 25 2014||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. VIDED with No. 13-132.|
|Jul 28 2014||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|Jul 28 2014||Record returned for U.S.C.A. for First Circuit.|
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
I really enjoyed getting to chat with the incomparable @AHoweBlogger about (1) why #SCOTUS's "shadow docket" *is* a big deal; (2) why it's so hard to figure out how to include it in broader assessments of the Justices' work; and (3) some possible ways to include it going forward. https://twitter.com/SCOTUSblog/status/1417545384314949635
How do you solve a problem like the shadow docket? @steve_vladeck has some thoughts and shared them with @AHoweBlogger in the latest SCOTUStalk.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.