|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Oct 13, 2021
Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit erred in concluding that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s capital sentences must be vacated on the ground that the district court, during its 21-day voir dire, did not ask each prospective juror for a specific accounting of the pretrial media coverage that he or she had read, heard or seen about Tsarnaev’s case; and (2) whether the district court committed reversible error at the penalty phase of Tsarnaev’s trial by excluding evidence that Tsarnaev’s older brother was allegedly involved in different crimes two years before the offenses for which Tsarnaev was convicted.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 06 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 5, 2020)|
|Oct 20 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 5, 2020 to December 7, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 21 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 7, 2020.|
|Nov 05 2020||Brief amicus curiae of The National Fraternal Order of Police filed.|
|Nov 23 2020||United States opposition to respondent's 30-day extension request not accepted for filing. (November 23, 2020 - corrected letter to be submitted)|
|Nov 23 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 7, 2020 to January 6, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 23 2020||Response to motion for an extension of time from petitioner United States filed.|
|Nov 24 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part; the time is extended to and including December 17, 2020.|
|Dec 17 2020||Brief of respondent Dzhokhar A. Tsarnaev in opposition filed.|
|Dec 18 2020||Letter waiving the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 15.5. filed.|
|Dec 23 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.|
|Dec 23 2020||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 11 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.|
|Jan 19 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.|
|Feb 12 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.|
|Feb 22 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/26/2021.|
|Mar 01 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/5/2021.|
|Mar 15 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.|
|Mar 22 2021||Petition GRANTED.|
|Mar 26 2021||Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.|
|Apr 15 2021||Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including June 14, 2021. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 20, 2021.|
|Apr 22 2021||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Dzhokhar A. Tsarnaev|
|Apr 28 2021||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, United States|
|May 05 2021||Brief amici curiae of James Fetzer, Ph. D., et al. filed.|
|Jun 14 2021||Joint appendix volumes 1 and 2 filed.|
|Jun 14 2021||Brief of petitioner United States filed.|
|Jun 14 2021||Motion for leave to file volume 3 of the joint appendix under seal with redacted copies for the public record filed by petitioner United States.|
|Jun 21 2021||Brief amicus curiae of American Bar Association filed.|
|Jun 21 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Criminal Justice Legal Foundation filed.|
|Jun 21 2021||Brief amicus curiae of The National Fraternal Order of Police filed.|
|Jul 07 2021||Joint Appendix submitted.|
|Jul 13 2021||ARGUMENT SET FOR Wednesday, October 13, 2021.|
|Jul 28 2021||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 1st Circuit.|
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
I really enjoyed getting to chat with the incomparable @AHoweBlogger about (1) why #SCOTUS's "shadow docket" *is* a big deal; (2) why it's so hard to figure out how to include it in broader assessments of the Justices' work; and (3) some possible ways to include it going forward. https://twitter.com/SCOTUSblog/status/1417545384314949635
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.