|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|20-437||9th Cir.||Apr 27, 2021||May 24, 2021||9-0||Sotomayor||OT 2020|
Holding: Each of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d)’s statutory requirements for bringing a collateral attack on a prior deportation order is mandatory.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor on May 24, 2021.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 05 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 5, 2020)|
|Oct 20 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 5, 2020 to December 7, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 21 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 7, 2020.|
|Dec 07 2020||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Refugio Palomar-Santiago.|
|Dec 07 2020||Brief of respondent Refugio Palomar-Santiago in opposition filed.|
|Dec 23 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.|
|Dec 23 2020||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 08 2021||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.|
|Jan 08 2021||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jan 22 2021||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner United States.|
|Jan 26 2021||Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent Refugio Palomar-Santiago.|
|Feb 03 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.|
|Feb 22 2021||Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent GRANTED, and Bradley N. Garcia, Esq., of Washington, D.C., is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case.|
|Feb 22 2021||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|Feb 22 2021||Brief of petitioner United States filed.|
|Mar 01 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Immigration Reform Law Institute filed.|
|Mar 12 2021||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, April 27, 2021.|
|Mar 15 2021||Record requested.|
|Mar 15 2021||The record from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.|
|Mar 24 2021||Brief of respondent Refugio Palomar-Santiago filed.|
|Mar 29 2021||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Federal Defenders filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 30 2021||CIRCULATED|
|Mar 31 2021||Brief amicus curiae of The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 31 2021||Brief amici curiae of The National Immigration Project, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 31 2021||Brief amici curiae of Former Executive Office of Immigration Review Judges filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 31 2021||Brief amici curiae of Professors Kelly Lytle Hernández, Mae Ngai, and Ingrid Eagly filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 16 2021||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 27 2021||Argued. For petitioner: Erica L. Ross, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Bradley N. Garcia, Washington, D. C. (Appointed by this Court.)|
|Apr 29 2021||Motion for leave to file a supplemental brief after oral argument filed by respondent Refugio Palomar-Santiago. (Distributed)|
|May 04 2021||Conditional cross-motion for leave to file a supplemental brief after oral argument filed by petitioner United States. (Distributed)|
|May 24 2021||Motion for leave to file a supplemental brief after oral argument GRANTED.|
|May 24 2021||Conditional cross-motion for leave to file a supplemental brief after oral argument GRANTED.|
|May 24 2021||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
Released today: annual financial disclosures for eight of the nine justices. Key takeaways: substantial book-royalty income for Sotomayor and Gorsuch; reduced travel reimbursements across the board during the pandemic.
Full story from @AHoweBlogger:
Less travel, plenty of royalties for justices in 2020 - SCOTUSblog
The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic were reflected in an unusual source: the justices’ 2020 financial disclosur...
Opinions next week — Monday and Thursday at 10:00 a.m. ET.
With 21 opinions to go, #SCOTUS enters the home stretch: Opinions expected on Monday and Thursday again next week, at 10 am Eastern both days. Court will also issue orders from today's conference at 9:30 am on Monday, June 14.
NEW: SCOTUS rules against federal government's interpretation of the Armed Career Criminal Act. Court says a felony involving recklessness does not satisfy the law's "use of physical force" element and thus does not trigger the law's "violent felony" mandatory minimum sentence.
It's a @SCOTUSblog kind of morning
R.I.P. Judge Robert Katzmann of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit. His influence on SCOTUS and American law was enormous.
The Supreme Court will release opinion(s?) at 10:00 a.m. ET. We’ll fire up the live blog at 9:45.
There are 22 outstanding opinions in argued cases including the Affordable Care Act, LGBTQ+ / religious liberty, voting rights, and student speech. https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/06/announcement-of-opinions-for-thursday-june-10/
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.