Enter your email address to subscribe to updates to this case (by doing so, you are accepting the terms in our privacy policy):
          

United States v. Palomar-Santiago

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
20-437 9th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD OT 2020

Issue: Whether a defendant, charged with unlawful reentry into the United States following removal, automatically satisfies the prerequisites to asserting the invalidity of the original removal order as an affirmative defense solely by showing that he was removed for a crime that would not be considered a removable offense under current circuit law, even if he cannot independently demonstrate administrative exhaustion or deprivation of the opportunity for judicial review.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Oct 05 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 5, 2020)
Oct 20 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 5, 2020 to December 7, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
Oct 21 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 7, 2020.
Dec 07 2020Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Refugio Palomar-Santiago.
Dec 07 2020Brief of respondent Refugio Palomar-Santiago in opposition filed.
Dec 23 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
Dec 23 2020Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)
Jan 08 2021Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
Jan 08 2021Petition GRANTED.
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
At a Glance
Awards