|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|20-437||9th Cir.||Apr 27, 2021||May 24, 2021||9-0||Sotomayor||OT 2020|
Holding: Each of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d)’s statutory requirements for bringing a collateral attack on a prior deportation order is mandatory.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor on May 24, 2021.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 05 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 5, 2020)|
|Oct 20 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 5, 2020 to December 7, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 21 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 7, 2020.|
|Dec 07 2020||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Refugio Palomar-Santiago.|
|Dec 07 2020||Brief of respondent Refugio Palomar-Santiago in opposition filed.|
|Dec 23 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.|
|Dec 23 2020||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 08 2021||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.|
|Jan 08 2021||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jan 22 2021||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner United States.|
|Jan 26 2021||Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent Refugio Palomar-Santiago.|
|Feb 03 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.|
|Feb 22 2021||Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent GRANTED, and Bradley N. Garcia, Esq., of Washington, D.C., is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case.|
|Feb 22 2021||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|Feb 22 2021||Brief of petitioner United States filed.|
|Mar 01 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Immigration Reform Law Institute filed.|
|Mar 12 2021||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, April 27, 2021.|
|Mar 15 2021||Record requested.|
|Mar 15 2021||The record from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.|
|Mar 24 2021||Brief of respondent Refugio Palomar-Santiago filed.|
|Mar 29 2021||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Federal Defenders filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 30 2021||CIRCULATED|
|Mar 31 2021||Brief amicus curiae of The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 31 2021||Brief amici curiae of The National Immigration Project, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 31 2021||Brief amici curiae of Former Executive Office of Immigration Review Judges filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 31 2021||Brief amici curiae of Professors Kelly Lytle Hernández, Mae Ngai, and Ingrid Eagly filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 16 2021||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 27 2021||Argued. For petitioner: Erica L. Ross, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Bradley N. Garcia, Washington, D. C. (Appointed by this Court.)|
|Apr 29 2021||Motion for leave to file a supplemental brief after oral argument filed by respondent Refugio Palomar-Santiago. (Distributed)|
|May 04 2021||Conditional cross-motion for leave to file a supplemental brief after oral argument filed by petitioner United States. (Distributed)|
|May 24 2021||Motion for leave to file a supplemental brief after oral argument GRANTED.|
|May 24 2021||Conditional cross-motion for leave to file a supplemental brief after oral argument GRANTED.|
|May 24 2021||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Jun 25 2021||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Incidentally, Gorsuch had been scheduled to give a speech at the University of Wyoming today, but his visit was canceled due to COVID.
Nothing from Kagan or Gorsuch though 😢 https://twitter.com/scotusblog/status/1438530948207874050
💥 Breyer continues book tour (including @colbertlateshow two nights ago).
💥 Barrett gave a speech Sunday @uofl.
💥 Thomas is slated to give the 2021 Tocqueville Lecture today @NotreDame (but, like Barrett's speech, there is apparently no livestream).
Can modern art shed new light on landmark Supreme Court rulings? A recent book says yes. Artist Xavier Cortada created 10 paintings depicting SCOTUS cases, and scholars used the paintings to re-examine each case's legacy. Here's @amanda_frost1's review:
The art of justice: Re-examining landmark Supreme Court cases through expressionist paintings - SCOTUSblog
Tired of reading jargon-filled law review articles with hundreds of footnotes? The perfect antidote is Painting Consti...
NEW: The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing tomorrow on Biden's nomination of Elizabeth Prelogar to be solicitor general, the federal government's top lawyer at the Supreme Court.
In separate remarks on Sunday, two justices argued that SCOTUS is not a political body.
Justice Barrett did so in a speech in Kentucky, after being introduced by Mitch McConnell:
Justice Breyer did so in an interview on Fox News: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-justice-stephen-breyer-political-reforms
Barrett concerned about public perception of Supreme Court
LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) — Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett expressed concerns Sunday that the public may incre...
SCOTUS provides instructions to the parties in the case of John Ramirez, the death-row inmate who has requested that his pastor be permitted to lay hands on him and pray out loud in the death chamber.
#SCOTUS issued a Friday-night order outlining specific questions for inmate John Ramirez & Texas to address in their briefing in his case, which is scheduled for argument in November. The Court put Ramirez's execution on hold earlier this week: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/091021zr_ap6c.pdf