
United States v. Palomar-Santiago
Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20-437 | 9th Cir. | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | OT 2020 |
Issue: Whether a defendant, charged with unlawful reentry into the United States following removal, automatically satisfies the prerequisites to asserting the invalidity of the original removal order as an affirmative defense solely by showing that he was removed for a crime that would not be considered a removable offense under current circuit law, even if he cannot independently demonstrate administrative exhaustion or deprivation of the opportunity for judicial review.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Justices grant review in 14 new cases but don’t act on hot-button issues (Amy Howe)
- Petitions of the week: The public-charge rule, Boston Marathon bombing and more (Andrew Hamm)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Oct 05 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 5, 2020) |
Oct 20 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 5, 2020 to December 7, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
Oct 21 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 7, 2020. |
Dec 07 2020 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Refugio Palomar-Santiago. |
Dec 07 2020 | Brief of respondent Refugio Palomar-Santiago in opposition filed. |
Dec 23 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021. |
Dec 23 2020 | Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed) |
Jan 08 2021 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. |
Jan 08 2021 | Petition GRANTED. |