|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-431||5th Cir.||Apr 17, 2019||Jun 24, 2019||5-4||Gorsuch||OT 2018|
Holding: Title 18 U. S. C. §924(c)(3)(B), which provides enhanced penalties for using a firearm during a “crime of violence,” is unconstitutionally vague.
Judgment: Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Gorsuch on June 24, 2019. Justice Kavanaugh filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Thomas and Alito joined, and in which Chief Justice Roberts joined as to all but Part II-C.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 03 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 2, 2018)|
|Oct 16 2018||Letter of October 16, 2018 from the Solicitor General filed.|
|Oct 22 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 2, 2018 to December 3, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 25 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 3, 2018.|
|Nov 01 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 2, 2018 to December 3, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 05 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 3, 2018.|
|Nov 30 2018||Brief of respondent Andre Levon Glover in opposition filed.|
|Nov 30 2018||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Andre Levon Glover.|
|Nov 30 2018||Brief of respondent Maurice Lamont Davis in opposition filed.|
|Dec 03 2018||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Maurice Lamont Davis.|
|Dec 19 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.|
|Dec 19 2018||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 04 2019||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Maurice Lamont Davis GRANTED.|
|Jan 04 2019||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Andre Levon Glover GRANTED.|
|Jan 04 2019||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jan 29 2019||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner United States.|
|Feb 11 2019||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, April 17, 2019|
|Feb 12 2019||Brief of petitioner United States filed.|
|Feb 19 2019||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|Mar 14 2019||Brief of Maurice Lamont Davis, et al. not accepted for filing. (Corrected brief submitted.) (March 18, 2019)|
|Mar 14 2019||Brief of respondents Maurice Lamont Davis, et al. filed.|
|Mar 20 2019||CIRCULATED|
|Mar 21 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 21 2019||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit.|
|Mar 21 2019||Brief amicus curiae of FAMM filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 21 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Federal Defenders filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 05 2019||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 05 2019||Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent Andre Levon Glover.|
|Apr 17 2019||Argued. For petitioner: Eric J. Feigin, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Brandon E. Beck, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Lubbock, Tex.|
|Apr 17 2019||Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.|
|May 13 2019||Motion to appoint counsel GRANTED, and J. Joseph Mongaras, Esq., of Dallas, Texas, is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent Andre L. Glover.|
|Jun 24 2019||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, and case REMANDED. Gorsuch, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Kavanaugh, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Thomas and Alito, JJ., joined, and in which Roberts, C. J., joined as to all but Part II–C.|
|Jul 26 2019||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.