|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-950||2d Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2017|
Issues: (1) Whether the warrantless seizure of an individual’s internet traffic information without probable cause violates the Fourth Amendment; and (2) whether the Sixth Amendment permits judges to find the facts necessary to support an otherwise unreasonable sentence.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 16 2017||Application (17A559) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 28, 2017 to December 28, 2017, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.|
|Nov 20 2017||Application (17A559) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until December 28, 2017.|
|Dec 22 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 5, 2018)|
|Jan 09 2018||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Ross William Ulbricht.|
|Jan 30 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 5, 2018 to March 7, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 31 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 7, 2018.|
|Feb 05 2018||Brief amicus curiae of American Black Cross filed.|
|Feb 05 2018||Brief amici curiae of National Lawyers Guild, et al filed.|
|Feb 05 2018||Brief amici curiae of Drug Policy Alliance, et al. filed.|
|Feb 05 2018||Brief amici curiae of Downsize DC Foundation, et al. filed.|
|Feb 05 2018||Brief amici curiae of Reason Foundation,et al. filed.|
|Mar 07 2018||Memorandum of respondent United States filed.|
|Mar 21 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/13/2018.|
|Mar 21 2018||Reply of petitioner Ross William Ulbricht filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 22 2018||Supplemental brief of petitioner Ross William Ulbricht filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 27 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/27/2018.|
|Jun 28 2018||Petition DENIED.|
#SCOTUS does not take up 2nd question in the case, on whether to overrule its 2020 decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma. Full order is here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/012122zr_3f14.pdf https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1484606315519516675
#SCOTUS grants one new case, sets it for argument in April: Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, on whether a state has authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country.
More opinions coming on Monday.
#SCOTUS website indicates that the Court is expected to release more opinions on Monday morning at 10 am.
The next #SCOTUS grants? Kevin McCarthy v. Nancy Pelosi in a fight over congressional proxy voting; the First Amendment-based ministerial exception to employment law returns; nondelegation doctrine (!); and the constitutionality of the FTC's structure.
Revenge of the rescheduled cases: Congressional proxy voting, the ministerial exception, and more - SCOTUSblog
The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming con...
JUST IN: The Supreme Court, over dissents from the three liberal justices, rejects a request from Texas abortion clinics to immediately return the litigation over Texas' six-week abortion law to a federal district court.
The Supreme Court issues a single opinion today, ruling in an 8-1 vote that a criminal defendant's rights were violated under the Sixth Amendment's confrontation clause when the government introduced a plea allocution from another proceeding. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-637_10n2.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: We expect one or more opinions in argued cases to be issued starting at 10 a.m. EST. At 9:45, we'll fire up our live blog, where we'll also chat about this week's arguments and last night's ruling on Trump records. Grab your ☕️ & join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, Jan. 20 - SCOTUSblog
On Thursday, January 20, we will be live blogging as the court releases opinions in one or more argued cases f...