Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

Since October, SCOTUSblog has been outside the Supreme Court collecting data and stories from people who traveled to see oral arguments in person during the 2019 term. Click to follow along with the month-long release of our Courtroom Access project.

Enter your email address to subscribe to updates to this case (by doing so, you are accepting the terms in our privacy policy):

Trump v. NAACP

Consolidated with:

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
18-588 D.D.C. Nov 12, 2019

Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’s decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Nov 05 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 5, 2018)
Nov 27 2018Letter of November 27, 2018 from the Solicitor General with respect to corrected supplemental brief of petitioners filed in case No. 18-587 filed. (11/28/2018)
Nov 30 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 5, 2018 to January 4, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
Dec 03 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part; the time is extended to and including December 17, 2018, for all respondents.
Dec 06 2018Brief amici curiae of The States of Texas, et al. filed. VIDED.
Dec 17 2018Brief of respondents Trustees of Princeton University, Microsoft Corporation, Maria De La Cruz Perales Sanchez in opposition filed.
Dec 26 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
Dec 26 2018Letter waiving the 14-day waiting period under Rule 15.5 filed.
Jan 04 2019Reply of petitioners Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Jan 14 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/18/2019.
Jun 10 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2019.
Jun 17 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
Jun 26 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/27/2019.
Jun 28 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 18-587 and the petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment in No. 18-589 are granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. VIDED.
Jul 01 2019Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 18-587. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 18-587. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the fling is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.”
Jul 08 2019SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, November 12, 2019. VIDED
Sep 16 2019Record requested from the U.S.C.A. District of Columbia Circuit.
Sep 20 2019Record received from the U.S.C.A. District of Columbia Circuit, is electronic
Nov 12 2019Argued. For petitioners: Noel J. Francisco, Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For private respondents: Theodore B. Olson, Washington, D. C. For state respondents: Michael J. Mongan, Solicitor General, San Francisco, Cal. VIDED.
Term Snapshot
At a Glance