|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-676||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2018|
Issue: Whether the district court erred in preliminarily enjoining the military from implementing nationwide the 2018 policy of Secretary of Defense James Mattis under which transgender individuals would be permitted to serve in the military, while individuals with a history of a medical condition called gender dysphoria would be disqualified from military service unless they meet certain conditions.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 23 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 24, 2018)|
|Dec 13 2018||Response to application (18A625) requested by Justice Kagan, due Friday, December 28, 2018, by noon ET.|
|Dec 13 2018||Application (18A625) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Dec 19 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund filed.VIDED|
|Dec 21 2018||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Foundation for Moral Law. (Distributed)|
|Dec 24 2018||Brief of Egeler, Anne Elizabeth State of Washington in opposition filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 26 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.|
|Dec 26 2018||Brief of respondents Ryan Karnoski, et al. in opposition filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 28 2018||Joint response to application from respondents filed.|
|Jan 04 2019||Reply of petitioners Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Jan 04 2019||Letter of petitioners Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Jan 04 2019||Reply of applicant Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed.|
|Jan 09 2019||Response to Petitioner's January 4, 2019 Letter of Ryan Karnoski, et al. not accepted for filing. (January 10, 2019 -To be re-submitted as a supplemental brief in compliance with Rule 33.1)|
|Jan 09 2019||Supplemental brief of respondents Ryan Karnoski, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 14 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/18/2019.|
|Jan 22 2019||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Foundation for Moral Law GRANTED.|
|Jan 22 2019||Application (18A625) referred to the Court.|
|Jan 22 2019||Petition DENIED.|
|Jan 22 2019||Application (18A625) granted by the Court. The application for stay presented to Justice Kagan and by her referred to the Court is granted, and the District Court’s December 11, 2017 order granting a preliminary injunction is stayed pending disposition of the Government’s appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and disposition of the Government’s petition for a writ of certiorari, if such writ is sought. If a writ of certiorari is sought and the Court denies the petition, this order shall terminate automatically. If the Court grants the petition for a writ of certiorari, this order shall terminate when the Court enters its judgment. Justice Ginsburg, Justice Breyer, Justice Sotomayor, and Justice Kagan would deny the application.|
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.