Tarrant Regional Water District v. Herrmann

Editor's Note :

Tarrant Regional Water District v. Herrmann

Interim Stat Pack for October Term 2018 – Adam Feldman

Justices release financial disclosures – Amy Howe

Challengers ask justices to put off census decision – Amy Howe

SCOTUSblog Coverage

SCOTUSblog Coverage

June 2019

Featured Posts

Sponsored by Casetext

SCOTUStalk see all

Email Digest Sign-Up

Merits Case Pages and Archives

Major Cases

Recent Decisions

Current Relists

Recent Special Features

Live Blog Archives

Merits Docket OT18 (June 10, 2019)

Merits Cases by Sitting

Majority Opinions by Author

Voting Breakdown Argued Cases

Majority Lineup 5-4 Decisions

June 2019

Download our App in the Apple Store

Videos see all

Peabody Award

Sigma Delta Chi

National Press Club Award

Silver Gavel Award

American Gavel Award

Webby Award

Conference of June 13, 2019

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
11-889	10th Cir.	Apr 23, 2013 Tr.Aud.	Jun 13, 2013	9-0	Sotomayor	OT 2012

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents the City of Dallas as amicus curiae in this case.

Holding: The Red River Compact, which allocates water rights within the Red River basin among the states of Oklahoma, Texas, Arkansas, and Louisiana, does not pre-empt the Oklahoma water statutes at issue in this case.

Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor on June 13, 2013.

Opinion analysis: Oklahoma skunks Texas in cross-border water rivalry (Thomas Merrill)
Details: Tarrant Regional Water District v. Herrmann (Tom Goldstein)
Argument analysis: Do Texans like salty water? (Thomas Merrill)
Argument preview: A Texas border water war (Thomas Merrill)
Three cases granted (Lyle Denniston)
Petition of the day (Kali Borkoski)

Date	Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Jan 19 2012	Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 21, 2012)
Feb 20 2012	Brief amicus curiae of Upper Trinity Regional Water District filed.
Feb 21 2012	Brief of respondent Rudolf John Herrmann, et al. in opposition filed.
Feb 21 2012	Brief amicus curiae of Texas filed.
Feb 21 2012	Brief amicus curiae of North Texas Municipal Water District filed.
Feb 21 2012	Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by City of Irving, Texas, City of Hugo, Oklahoma and Hugo Municipal Authority.
Feb 21 2012	Letter proposing a lodging of non record material received from counsel for amici City of Irving, Texas, et al.
Mar 6 2012	Reply of petitioner Tarrant Regional Water District filed.
Mar 7 2012	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 23, 2012.
Mar 26 2012	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 30, 2012.
Apr 2 2012	The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
Nov 30 2012	Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
Dec 11 2012	Supplemental brief of respondents Rudolf John Herrmann, et al. filed.
Dec 12 2012	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 4, 2013.
Dec 12 2012	Supplemental brief of petitioner Tarrant Regional Water District filed. (Distributed)
Dec 20 2012	Lodging received from counsel for amici City of Irving, Texas, et al. in electronic format.
Jan 4 2013	Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by City of Irving, Texas, City of Hugo, Oklahoma and Hugo Municipal Authority GRANTED.
Jan 4 2013	Petition GRANTED.
Feb 11 2013	SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, April 23, 2013
Feb 12 2013	Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents.
Feb 19 2013	Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.
Feb 19 2013	Joint appendix filed. (Two Volumes) (Statement of costs filed.)
Feb 19 2013	Brief of petitioner Tarrant Regional Water District filed.
Feb 20 2013	Proposal of counsel for petitioners to lodge copies of non-record material which were relied on in their opening brief.
Feb 25 2013	Brief amici curiae of City of Irving, Texas, City of Hugo, Oklahoma, and Hugo Municipal Authority filed.
Feb 25 2013	Brief amicus curiae of North Texas Municipal Water District filed.
Feb 25 2013	Brief amicus curiae of Upper Trinity Regional Water District filed.
Feb 26 2013	Brief amici curiae of Olen Paul Matthews and Michael Pease filed.
Feb 26 2013	Brief amicus curiae of City of Dallas filed.
Feb 26 2013	Brief amicus curiae of United States supporting Vacatur and Remand filed.
Feb 26 2013	Brief amici curiae of Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce, et al. filed.
Feb 26 2013	Brief amicus curiae of Texas filed.
Feb 26 2013	Brief amicus curiae of Texas Water Conservation Association filed.
Feb 26 2013	Brief amici curiae of Cities of Arlington and Fort Worth, Texas filed. (Distributed)
Feb 26 2013	Brief amicus curiae of North Texas Commission filed. (Distributed)
Feb 28 2013	Record Received from the U.S.C.A. for the 10th Circuit. (1-Box )
Mar 1 2013	CIRCULATED.
Mar 21 2013	Brief of respondent Rudolf John Herrmann, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Mar 27 2013	Brief amicus curiae of Oklahomans for Responsible Water Policy filed. (Distributed)
Mar 27 2013	Brief amici curiae of Louisiana and Arkansas filed. (Distributed)
Mar 27 2013	Brief amici curiae of Republican River Water Conservation District, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Mar 27 2013	Brief amicus curiae of Oklahoma Independent Petroleum Association filed. (Distributed)
Mar 28 2013	Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
Mar 28 2013	Brief amici curiae of Professors of law and political science filed. (Distributed)
Mar 28 2013	Brief amicus curiae of City of Oklahoma City and Oklahoma City Water Utilities Trust filed.
Mar 28 2013	Brief amici curiae of States of Colorado, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Mar 28 2013	Brief amici curiae of Chickasaw and Choctaw Nations filed. (Distributed)
Mar 28 2013	Proposal of amici Oklahoma City Water Utilities Trust to lodge non-record material.
Apr 9 2013	Lodging consisting of three documents received from counsel for the petitioner. (Distributed).
Apr 12 2013	Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
Apr 15 2013	Reply of petitioner Tarrant Regional Water District filed. (Distributed)
Apr 23 2013	Argued. For petitioner: Charles A. Rothfeld, Washington, D. C.; and Ann O'Connell, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Lisa S. Blatt, Washington, D. C.
Jun 13 2013	Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Jul 15 2013	JUDGMENT ISSUED.
Aug 16 2013	Record returned to U.S.C.A. for 10th Circuit.

Featured Posts

Interim Stat Pack for October Term 2018 – Adam Feldman

Justices release financial disclosures – Amy Howe

Challengers ask justices to put off census decision – Amy Howe
Sponsored by Casetext
SCOTUStalk see all
Email Digest Sign-Up
Receive a daily email digest from Feedburner by entering your email.
Merits Case Pages and Archives

Archives

or

This Week at the Court
On Monday, the Supreme Court released orders from the June 6 conference on Monday; the justices added five new cases to their merits docket for next term: Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Christian, McKinney v. Arizona, Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma, Monasky v. Taglieri and Comcast Corp. v. National Association of African American-Owned Media.
Also on Monday, the justices released their opinions in three argued cases: Quarles v. U.S., Return Mail v. U.S. Postal Service and Parker Drilling Management Services v. Newton.
On Thursday, the justices met for their June 13 conference; John Elwood's "Relist Watch" compiles the petitions that were relisted for this conference.
Major Cases
- Department of Commerce v. New York
  (1) Whether the district court erred in enjoining the secretary of the Department of Commerce from reinstating a question about citizenship to the 2020 decennial census on the ground that the secretary’s decision violated the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 701 et seq; (2) whether, in an action seeking to set aside agency action under the APA, a district court may order discovery outside the administrative record to probe the mental processes of the agency decisionmaker -- including by compelling the testimony of high-ranking executive branch officials -- without a strong showing that the decisionmaker disbelieved the objective reasons in the administrative record, irreversibly prejudged the issue, or acted on a legally forbidden basis; and (3) whether the secretary’s decision to add a citizenship question to the decennial census violated the enumeration clause of the U.S. Constitution.
- Lamone v. Benisek
  In case in which the plaintiffs allege that a Maryland congressional district was gerrymandered to retaliate against them for their political views: (1) whether the various legal claims articulated by the three-judge district court are unmanageable; (2) whether the three-judge district court erred when, in granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, it resolved disputes of material fact as to multiple elements of plaintiffs’ claims, failed to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, and treated as “undisputed” evidence that is the subject of still-unresolved hearsay and other evidentiary objections; and (3) whether the three-judge district court abused its discretion in entering an injunction despite the plaintiffs’ years-long delay in seeking injunctive relief, rendering the remedy applicable to at most one election before the next decennial census necessitates another redistricting.
- Kisor v. Wilkie
  Whether the Supreme Court should overrule Auer v. Robbins and Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co., which direct courts to defer to an agency’s reasonable interpretation of its own ambiguous regulation.
- Rucho v. Common Cause
  (1) Whether plaintiffs have standing to press their partisan gerrymandering claims; (2) whether plaintiffs’ partisan gerrymandering claims are justiciable; and (3) whether North Carolina’s 2016 congressional map is, in fact, an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander.
- The American Legion v. American Humanist Association
  (1) Whether a 93-year-old memorial to the fallen of World War I is unconstitutional merely because it is shaped like a cross; (2) whether the constitutionality of a passive display incorporating religious symbolism should be assessed under the tests articulated in Lemon v. Kurtzman, Van Orden v. Perry, Town of Greece v. Galloway or some other test; and (3) whether, if the test from Lemon v. Kurtzman applies, the expenditure of funds for the routine upkeep and maintenance of a cross-shaped war memorial, without more, amounts to an excessive entanglement with religion in violation of the First Amendment.
- Gamble v. United States
  Whether the Supreme Court should overrule the “separate sovereigns” exception to the double jeopardy clause.
see all this term’s cases »
Recent Decisions
- Quarles v. United States Michigan’s third-degree home-invasion statute substantially corresponds to or is narrower than generic burglary for purposes of qualifying for enhanced sentencing under the Armed Career Criminal Act.
- Parker Drilling Management Services, Ltd. v. Newton Under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, when federal law addresses the relevant issue, state law is not adopted as surrogate federal law on the Outer Continental Shelf.
- Return Mail Inc. v. United States Postal Service The federal government is not a “person” capable of petitioning the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to institute patent review proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act.
- Azar v. Allina Health Services Because the Department of Health and Human Services neglected its statutory notice-and-comment obligations when it revealed a new policy that dramatically – and retroactively – reduced Medicare payments to hospitals serving low-income patients, its policy must be vacated.
- Fort Bend County, Texas v. Davis The charge-filing precondition to suit set out in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is not a jurisdictional requirement.
- Mont v. United States Pretrial detention later credited as time served for a new conviction tolls a supervised-release term under 18 U.S.C. §3624(e), even if the court must make the tolling calculation after learning whether the time will be credited.
- Taggart v. Lorenzen A creditor may be held in civil contempt for violating a bankruptcy court’s discharge order if there is no fair ground of doubt as to whether the order barred the creditor’s conduct.
see all this term’s cases »
Current Relists
- Jordan v. City of Darien, Georgia Whether the existence of probable cause defeats a First Amendment retaliatory arrest claim as a matter of law.
- Klein v. Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries (1) Whether Oregon violated the free speech and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment by compelling the Kleins to design and create a custom wedding cake to celebrate a same-sex wedding ritual in violation of their sincerely held religious beliefs; (2) whether the Supreme Court should overrule Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith; and (3) whether the Supreme Court should reaffirm Smith’s hybrid-rights doctrine, applying strict scrutiny to free exercise claims that implicate other fundamental rights, and resolve the circuit split over the doctrine’s precedential status.
- McGee v. McFadden (1) Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit erred when it found no constitutional error when the state failed to disclose Brady evidence, a letter from a jailhouse snitch, until the post-trial hearing for a motion for a new trial; (2) whether the state and federal courts’ decisions were contrary to Giglio v. United States, United States v. Bagley, Brady v. Maryland and Napue v. Illinois when the state failed to disclose material impeachment evidence, a letter from a jailhouse snitch who testified that petitioner confessed to him; and (3) whether the state and federal courts erred in finding that trial counsel rendered effective assistance of counsel when he failed to interview Michael Jones and call him as a witness.
More Petitions »
Recent Special Features
Statistical Snapshot

Cases argued 69

Cases decided 42

Summary reversals 5

Merits cases granted to date 73

see all »
Live Blog Archives
See all
Twitter Feed

Tweets by @SCOTUSblog

Merits Docket OT18 (June 10, 2019)
Merits Cases by Sitting
Majority Opinions by Author
Voting Breakdown Argued Cases
Majority Lineup 5-4 Decisions

Full Calendar Submit Event

Orders/Opinions
Arguments
Conferences

Events
Holidays
Multiple

Download our App in the Apple Store
Videos see all

Justice Thomas at the Supreme Court Historical Society

On June 3, Justice Clarence Thomas spoke with David Rubenstein for the Supreme Court Historical Society’s annual lecture at the Supreme Court.

Peabody Award
Awarded the Peabody Award for excellence in electronic media.
Sigma Delta Chi
Awarded the Sigma Delta Chi deadline reporting award for online coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.
National Press Club Award
Awarded the National Press Club's Breaking News Award for coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.
Silver Gavel Award
Awarded the Silver Gavel Award by the American Bar Association for fostering the American public’s understanding of the law and the legal system.
American Gavel Award
Awarded the American Gavel Award for Distinguished Reporting About the Judiciary to recognize the highest standards of reporting about courts and the justice system.
Webby Award
Awarded the Webby Award for excellence on the internet.

Cases argued	69
Cases decided	42
Summary reversals	5
Merits cases granted to date	73

3
Orders
Opinions

6
Conference

10
Orders
Opinions

13
Conference

17
Orders
Opinions

20
Conference