|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|15-543||D.C. Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2015|
Issue: (1) Whether the Affordable Care Act’s tax on going without health insurance is a “Bill for raising Revenue” to which the Origination Clause applies; and (2) whether the Senate's gut-and-replace procedure was a constitutionally valid “amend [ment]” pursuant to the Origination Clause.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 26 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 27, 2015)|
|Nov 2 2015||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Nov 18 2015||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including December 28, 2015.|
|Nov 23 2015||Brief amici curiae of Southeastern Legal Foundation, and The Beacon Center filed.|
|Nov 24 2015||Brief amici curiae of Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, et al. filed.|
|Nov 25 2015||Brief amici curiae of Texas, et al. filed.|
|Nov 25 2015||Brief amici curiae of U.S. Representative Trent Franks, Chairman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee, and 45 Other Members of the House of Representatives filed.|
|Nov 25 2015||Brief amici curiae of U.S. Justice Foundation, et al. filed.|
|Nov 25 2015||Brief amici curiae of United States Senators Cornyn, Cruz, and Lee filed.|
|Nov 25 2015||Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed.|
|Nov 25 2015||Brief amicus curiae of Mountain States Legal Foundation filed.|
|Nov 27 2015||Brief amicus curiae of David Boyle filed.|
|Dec 7 2015||Motion for leave to file amici brief out of time filed by Daniel G. Anderson, et al.|
|Dec 28 2015||Brief of respondents Department fo Health and Human Services, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Dec 29 2015||Reply of petitioner Matt Sissel filed.|
|Dec 30 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 15, 2016.|
|Jan 19 2016||Motion for leave to file amici brief out of time filed by Daniel G. Anderson, et al. DENIED.|
|Jan 19 2016||Petition DENIED.|
Released today: annual financial disclosures for eight of the nine justices. Key takeaways: substantial book-royalty income for Sotomayor and Gorsuch; reduced travel reimbursements across the board during the pandemic.
Full story from @AHoweBlogger:
Less travel, plenty of royalties for justices in 2020 - SCOTUSblog
The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic were reflected in an unusual source: the justices’ 2020 financial disclosur...
Opinions next week — Monday and Thursday at 10:00 a.m. ET.
With 21 opinions to go, #SCOTUS enters the home stretch: Opinions expected on Monday and Thursday again next week, at 10 am Eastern both days. Court will also issue orders from today's conference at 9:30 am on Monday, June 14.
NEW: SCOTUS rules against federal government's interpretation of the Armed Career Criminal Act. Court says a felony involving recklessness does not satisfy the law's "use of physical force" element and thus does not trigger the law's "violent felony" mandatory minimum sentence.
It's a @SCOTUSblog kind of morning
R.I.P. Judge Robert Katzmann of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit. His influence on SCOTUS and American law was enormous.
The Supreme Court will release opinion(s?) at 10:00 a.m. ET. We’ll fire up the live blog at 9:45.
There are 22 outstanding opinions in argued cases including the Affordable Care Act, LGBTQ+ / religious liberty, voting rights, and student speech. https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/06/announcement-of-opinions-for-thursday-june-10/
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.