|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|15-543||D.C. Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2015|
Issue: (1) Whether the Affordable Care Act’s tax on going without health insurance is a “Bill for raising Revenue” to which the Origination Clause applies; and (2) whether the Senate's gut-and-replace procedure was a constitutionally valid “amend [ment]” pursuant to the Origination Clause.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 26 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 27, 2015)|
|Nov 2 2015||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Nov 18 2015||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including December 28, 2015.|
|Nov 23 2015||Brief amici curiae of Southeastern Legal Foundation, and The Beacon Center filed.|
|Nov 24 2015||Brief amici curiae of Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, et al. filed.|
|Nov 25 2015||Brief amici curiae of Texas, et al. filed.|
|Nov 25 2015||Brief amici curiae of U.S. Representative Trent Franks, Chairman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee, and 45 Other Members of the House of Representatives filed.|
|Nov 25 2015||Brief amici curiae of U.S. Justice Foundation, et al. filed.|
|Nov 25 2015||Brief amici curiae of United States Senators Cornyn, Cruz, and Lee filed.|
|Nov 25 2015||Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed.|
|Nov 25 2015||Brief amicus curiae of Mountain States Legal Foundation filed.|
|Nov 27 2015||Brief amicus curiae of David Boyle filed.|
|Dec 7 2015||Motion for leave to file amici brief out of time filed by Daniel G. Anderson, et al.|
|Dec 28 2015||Brief of respondents Department fo Health and Human Services, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Dec 29 2015||Reply of petitioner Matt Sissel filed.|
|Dec 30 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 15, 2016.|
|Jan 19 2016||Motion for leave to file amici brief out of time filed by Daniel G. Anderson, et al. DENIED.|
|Jan 19 2016||Petition DENIED.|
Bill Cosby’s prosecutors asked the Supreme Court to reinstate his conviction today. Quick explainer.
In our latest episode of SCOTUStalk, @shefalil of @19thnews joined us to preview Wednesday's argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health. Shefali explains the current state of abortion access and the case's implications in Mississippi and across America.
Roe, Dobbs, and the current state of abortion access - SCOTUSblog
In advance of Wednesday's oral argument in the momentous abortion case, Shefali Luthra, a gender and health care r...
Update: Without calling for a response or referring the case to the full court, Justice Breyer just rejected last week's challenge from Massachusetts hospital workers who object to the hospital's COVID vaccine mandate.
(Breyer handles emergency requests from Massachusetts.)
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket challenge to a COVID vaccine mandate. This one is from employees at Mass General Brigham who say the Boston-based hospital violated federal law by not granting them exemptions from the hospital's vaccine policy. Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/21A175.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral argument in a case about Medicare payments to hospitals that serve low-income patients. Lots of money at stake, plus potential implications for the Chevron doctrine. @JACoganJr explains the case:
Money for safety-net hospitals at stake in dispute over Medicare payment formula - SCOTUSblog
When it comes to highlighting the complexity of the Medicare Act and its hospital payment rules, Becerra v. Empire...
Two days from now, SCOTUS will hear the biggest abortion case in a generation. In a battle over a Mississippi law, abortion opponents are asking the court to end the constitutional right to abortion. Here's our preview of the case, via @AHoweBlogger.
Roe v. Wade hangs in balance as reshaped court prepares to hear biggest abortion case in decades - SCOTUSblog
When he ran for president in 2016, then-candidate Donald Trump promised to nominate Supreme Court justices who would...
JUST IN: One new cert grant this morning: Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP. More on the case here: https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/berger-v-north-carolina-state-conference-of-the-naacp/
#SCOTUS adds one new case to its merits docket this morning: Berger v. NC Conference of NAACP, in which the justices will weigh in on an effort by Republican legislators in the state to intervene to defend the state’s voter-ID law. Here's the order: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112421zr_7li8.pdf