Shinn v. Kayer

Pending petition
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
19-1302 9th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated 28 U.S.C. § 2254’s deferential standard, and employed a flawed methodology that the Supreme Court has repeatedly condemned, when it granted habeas relief based on a de novo finding that a Sixth Amendment violation had occurred.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Feb 18 2020Application (19A923) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 17, 2020 to April 16, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Feb 21 2020Application (19A923) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until April 16, 2020.
May 15 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 19, 2020)
Jun 03 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 19, 2020 to July 19, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
Jun 03 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 20, 2020. See Rule 30.1.
Jun 19 2020Brief amici curiae of Idaho, et al. filed.
Jul 13 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 20, 2020 to August 19, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
Jul 14 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 19, 2020.
Aug 19 2020Brief of respondent George Kayer in opposition filed.
Sep 02 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
Sep 02 2020Reply of petitioners David Shinn, et al. filed. (Distributed)
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
At a Glance
Awards