|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-417||7th Cir.||Nov 4, 2013||Jan 27, 2014||9-0||Scalia||OT 2013|
Holding: The time petitioners spend donning and doffing their protective gear is not compensable by operation of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U. S. C. § 203(o).
Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Scalia on January 27, 2014. Justice Sotomayor joins the opinion except as to footnote 7.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 10 2012||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 5, 2012)|
|Oct 23 2012||Waiver of right of respondent United States Steel Corporation to respond filed.|
|Oct 29 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 20, 2012.|
|Nov 13 2012||Response Requested . (Due December 13, 2012)|
|Nov 19 2012||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 14, 2013.|
|Jan 14 2013||Brief of respondent United States Steel Corporation in opposition filed.|
|Jan 30 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013.|
|Jan 30 2013||Reply of petitioners Clifton Sandifer, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 19 2013||Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.|
|Mar 5 2013||Record from U.S.C.A. for 7th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Mar 5 2013||Record from U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Nevada is electronic and located on PACER, with the exception of 1 box of exhibits.|
|Mar 11 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.|
|Mar 25 2013||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including May 13, 2013.|
|Mar 25 2013||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including July 12, 2013.|
|May 13 2013||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)|
|May 13 2013||Brief of petitioner Clifton Sandifer, et al. filed.|
|May 20 2013||Brief amici curiae of American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, et al. filed.|
|Jul 10 2013||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is further extended to and including July 19, 2013.|
|Jul 19 2013||Brief of respondent United States Steel Corporation filed.|
|Jul 26 2013||Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed.|
|Jul 26 2013||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Jul 26 2013||Brief of amicus curiae Grocery Manufacturers Association filed.|
|Jul 26 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.|
|Jul 26 2013||Brief amici curiae of American Meat Institute, et al. filed.|
|Aug 19 2013||CIRCULATED.|
|Aug 19 2013||Reply of petitioners Clifton Sandifer, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 20 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, November 4, 2013.|
|Oct 7 2013||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Nov 4 2013||Argued. For petitioners: Eric Schnapper, Seattle, Wash. For respondent: Lawrence C. DiNardo, Chicago, Ill.; and Anthony A. Yang, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)|
|Jan 27 2014||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Scalia, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, and Kagan, JJ., joined, and in which Sotomayor, J., joined except as to footnote 7.|
|Feb 28 2014||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|Aug 5 2014||Record returned for U.S.D.C. Northern District of Indiana (Hammond Division of Lafayette) has been returned.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.