|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-417||7th Cir.||Nov 4, 2013||Jan 27, 2014||9-0||Scalia||OT 2013|
Holding: The time petitioners spend donning and doffing their protective gear is not compensable by operation of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U. S. C. § 203(o).
Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Scalia on January 27, 2014. Justice Sotomayor joins the opinion except as to footnote 7.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 10 2012||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 5, 2012)|
|Oct 23 2012||Waiver of right of respondent United States Steel Corporation to respond filed.|
|Oct 29 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 20, 2012.|
|Nov 13 2012||Response Requested . (Due December 13, 2012)|
|Nov 19 2012||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 14, 2013.|
|Jan 14 2013||Brief of respondent United States Steel Corporation in opposition filed.|
|Jan 30 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013.|
|Jan 30 2013||Reply of petitioners Clifton Sandifer, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 19 2013||Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.|
|Mar 5 2013||Record from U.S.C.A. for 7th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Mar 5 2013||Record from U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Nevada is electronic and located on PACER, with the exception of 1 box of exhibits.|
|Mar 11 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.|
|Mar 25 2013||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including May 13, 2013.|
|Mar 25 2013||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including July 12, 2013.|
|May 13 2013||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)|
|May 13 2013||Brief of petitioner Clifton Sandifer, et al. filed.|
|May 20 2013||Brief amici curiae of American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, et al. filed.|
|Jul 10 2013||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is further extended to and including July 19, 2013.|
|Jul 19 2013||Brief of respondent United States Steel Corporation filed.|
|Jul 26 2013||Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed.|
|Jul 26 2013||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Jul 26 2013||Brief of amicus curiae Grocery Manufacturers Association filed.|
|Jul 26 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.|
|Jul 26 2013||Brief amici curiae of American Meat Institute, et al. filed.|
|Aug 19 2013||CIRCULATED.|
|Aug 19 2013||Reply of petitioners Clifton Sandifer, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 20 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, November 4, 2013.|
|Oct 7 2013||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Nov 4 2013||Argued. For petitioners: Eric Schnapper, Seattle, Wash. For respondent: Lawrence C. DiNardo, Chicago, Ill.; and Anthony A. Yang, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)|
|Jan 27 2014||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Scalia, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, and Kagan, JJ., joined, and in which Sotomayor, J., joined except as to footnote 7.|
|Feb 28 2014||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|Aug 5 2014||Record returned for U.S.D.C. Northern District of Indiana (Hammond Division of Lafayette) has been returned.|
As a lawyer, Leondra Kruger argued 12 cases at the U.S. Supreme Court. As a California Supreme Court justice, she has a liberal-leaning record but has sometimes voted with more conservative colleagues in divided cases. Here's @AHoweBlogger's profile:
Profile of a potential nominee: Leondra Kruger - SCOTUSblog
During a 2020 Democratic presidential primary debate, then-candidate Joe Biden pledged that, if elected, he would nomi...
Two candidates to replace Breyer stand apart: Leondra Kruger and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Kruger is six years younger. Jackson recently underwent a Senate confirmation. And the role of Ron Klain, Biden's chief of staff, may be pivotal.
How Biden will choose the next Supreme Court nominee - SCOTUSblog
With today’s reporting that Justice Stephen Breyer intends to retire, we now kick off our analysis of potentia...
Stephen Breyer wrote major opinions favoring abortion rights, demarcating the separation of powers, and rejecting a challenge to Obamacare. In his later years, he questioned the constitutionality of the death penalty. Our retrospective, via @AHoweBlogger:
Stephen Breyer, pragmatic liberal, will retire at end of term - SCOTUSblog
Justice Stephen Breyer, a devoted pragmatist and the senior member of the Supreme Court’s liberal wing, will r...
BREAKING: Per @PeteWilliamsNBC of @NBCNews, Justice Stephen Breyer is retiring. The 83-year-old Breyer, a pragmatic liberal who has served on the Supreme Court for nearly 28 years, is expected to tell the White House imminently of his intention to step down.
NEWS: Supreme Court Justice Breyer to retire, @PeteWilliamsNBC reporting live on @NBCNews Special Report
A rule that allows SCOTUS to hear cases before appeals courts weigh in used to be very rare. But in the past three years, it's become far more common. And the justices haven't said why.
@steve_vladeck explains the resurgent writ of "cert before judgment."
The rise of certiorari before judgment - SCOTUSblog
For obvious reasons, the Supreme Court’s decision on Monday to grant certiorari in a pair of cases challenging...
Sonia Sotomayor appeared this morning on @TODAYshow to promote her new children's book, "Just Help!: How to Build a Better World." She spoke briefly about the public's perception of the court. Here's the interview: https://www.today.com/video/justice-sotomayor-on-new-book-supreme-court-s-credibility-loss-of-her-mother-131639365722