|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Issue: Whether the 14th Amendment bars states from prohibiting abortions that are sought solely because of a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Apr 09 2021||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 13, 2021)|
|Apr 30 2021||Motion of Little Rock Family Planning Services, et al. for an extension of time not accepted for filing. (May 03, 2021--corrected version to be submitted)|
|May 03 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 13, 2021 to June 28, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.|
|May 04 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 28, 2021.|
|May 11 2021||Brief amicus curiae of American Center for Law & Justice filed.|
|May 13 2021||Brief amicus curiae of The Jerome Lejeune Foundation filed.|
|May 13 2021||Brief amici curiae of Americans United for Life filed.|
|May 13 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Charlotte Lozier Institute filed.|
|May 13 2021||Brief amici curiae of United States Senators and Representatives filed.|
|May 13 2021||Brief amici curiae of Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, et al. filed.|
|May 13 2021||Brief amici curiae of State of Missouri and 21 other states filed.|
|May 13 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Life Legal Defense Foundation filed.|
|Jun 28 2021||Brief of respondents Little Rock Family Planning Services, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Jul 09 2021||Rule 29.6 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed with respect to brief in oppositon of Little Rock Family Planning Services, et al..|
|Jul 13 2021||Reply of petitioners Leslie Rutledge, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Arkansas, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jul 14 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.|
#SCOTUS does not take up 2nd question in the case, on whether to overrule its 2020 decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma. Full order is here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/012122zr_3f14.pdf https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1484606315519516675
#SCOTUS grants one new case, sets it for argument in April: Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, on whether a state has authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country.
More opinions coming on Monday.
#SCOTUS website indicates that the Court is expected to release more opinions on Monday morning at 10 am.
The next #SCOTUS grants? Kevin McCarthy v. Nancy Pelosi in a fight over congressional proxy voting; the First Amendment-based ministerial exception to employment law returns; nondelegation doctrine (!); and the constitutionality of the FTC's structure.
Revenge of the rescheduled cases: Congressional proxy voting, the ministerial exception, and more - SCOTUSblog
The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming con...
JUST IN: The Supreme Court, over dissents from the three liberal justices, rejects a request from Texas abortion clinics to immediately return the litigation over Texas' six-week abortion law to a federal district court.
The Supreme Court issues a single opinion today, ruling in an 8-1 vote that a criminal defendant's rights were violated under the Sixth Amendment's confrontation clause when the government introduced a plea allocution from another proceeding. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-637_10n2.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: We expect one or more opinions in argued cases to be issued starting at 10 a.m. EST. At 9:45, we'll fire up our live blog, where we'll also chat about this week's arguments and last night's ruling on Trump records. Grab your ☕️ & join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, Jan. 20 - SCOTUSblog
On Thursday, January 20, we will be live blogging as the court releases opinions in one or more argued cases f...