|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 12 2018||Response to application (17A745) requested by The Chief Justice, due Wednesday, January 17, by noon ET.|
|Jan 12 2018||Application (17A745) for a stay pending appeal, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Jan 16 2018||Motion for leave to file amicus brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by Senator Joseph B. Scarnati, III.|
|Jan 16 2018||Motion for leave to file amici brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by George Holding, et al.|
|Jan 17 2018||Response to application from respondents Common Cause, et al. filed.|
|Jan 17 2018||Response to application from respondents League of Women Voters of North Carolina, et al. filed.|
|Jan 17 2018||Motion for leave to file amicus curiae brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by Louisiana, et al.|
|Jan 18 2018||Application (17A745) referred to the Court.|
|Jan 18 2018||Application (17A745) granted by the Court. The application for stay presented to The Chief Justice and by him referred to the Court is granted, and it is ordered that the order of the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, case Nos. 1:16-CV-1026 and 1:16-CV-1164, entered January 9, 2018, is stayed pending the timely filing and disposition of an appeal in this Court. Justice Ginsburg and Justice Sotomayor would deny the application for stay.|
|Jan 18 2018||Reply of applicants Robert A. Rucho, et al. filed.|
|Jan 23 2018||Motion to construe the application for a stay as a jurisdictional statement and for expedited briefing and oral argument schedule filed by appellees Common Cause, et al. and League of Women Voters of North Carolina, et al.|
|Feb 06 2018||The motion of appellees to construe the application for a stay as a jurisdictional statement and for an expedited briefing and oral argument schedule is denied. Justice Ginsburg and Justice Sotomayor would grant the motion.|
|Mar 12 2018||Statement as to jurisdiction filed. (Response due April 13, 2018)|
|Mar 22 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 13, 2018 to April 27, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 23 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 27, 2018, for all appellees.|
|Apr 27 2018||Motion to affirm filed by appellees Common Cause, et al.|
|Apr 27 2018||Motion to affirm filed by appellees League of Women Voters of North Carolina, et al.|
|May 15 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/31/2018.|
|May 15 2018||Reply of appellants Robert A. Rucho, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|May 18 2018||Supplemental brief of appellees Common Cause, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 18 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/21/2018.|
|Jun 19 2018||Second supplemental brief of appellees Common Cause, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 20 2018||Supplemental brief of appellees League of Women Voters of North Carolina, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 20 2018||Supplemental brief of appellants Robert A. Rucho, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 25 2018||The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina for further consideration in light of Gill v. Whitford, 585 U. S. ____ (2018).|
|Jul 27 2018||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.