|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-328||3d Cir.||Oct 16, 2019||Dec 10, 2019||8-1||Thomas||OT 2019|
Holding: Absent the application of an equitable doctrine, the statute of limitations in the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §1692k(d), begins to run when the alleged FDCPA violation occurs, not when the violation is discovered.
Judgment: Affirmed, 8-1, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on December 10, 2019. Justice Sotomayor filed a concurring opinion. Justice Ginsburg filed an opinion dissenting in part and dissenting from the judgment.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Aug 09 2018||Application (18A161) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 13, 2018 to October 12, 2018, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|Aug 15 2018||Application (18A161) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until September 12, 2018.|
|Sep 11 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 15, 2018)|
|Oct 31 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.|
|Nov 05 2018||Response Requested. (Due December 5, 2018)|
|Nov 21 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 5, 2018 to January 4, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 23 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 4, 2019.|
|Jan 04 2019||Brief of respondents Paul Klemm, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Jan 23 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.|
|Feb 19 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.|
|Feb 25 2019||Petition GRANTED.|
|Mar 08 2019||Joint motion of the parties for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.|
|Mar 19 2019||Joint motion of the parties to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits is granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including May 13, 2019. The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including July 12, 2019.|
|Apr 03 2019||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Kevin Rotkiske.|
|Apr 22 2019||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|May 13 2019||Brief of petitioner Kevin Rotkiske filed.|
|May 20 2019||Brief amici curiae of Samuel L. Bray, David Marcus, and Stephen C. Yeazell in support of neither party filed.|
|May 20 2019||Amicus brief of National Consumer Law Center not accepted for filing. (May 29, 2019)(Corrected version Submitted)|
|May 20 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National Consumer Law Center filed.|
|Jul 01 2019||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, October 16, 2019.|
|Jul 12 2019||Brief of respondents Paul Klemm, et al. filed.|
|Jul 18 2019||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Jul 18 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Receivables Management Association International, Inc. filed.|
|Jul 19 2019||Motion of United States for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Jul 19 2019||Brief amici curiae of Mortgage Bankers Association and the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.|
|Jul 19 2019||Brief amicus curiae of ACA International filed.|
|Jul 19 2019||Brief amicus curiae of The National Creditors Bar Association filed.|
|Aug 01 2019||CIRCULATED|
|Aug 12 2019||Reply of petitioner Kevin Rotkiske filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 16 2019||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 3rd Circuit.|
|Aug 23 2019||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Sep 12 2019||Complete record received in electronic format (U.S.C.A. 3rd Circuit and DIstrict Court filings).|
|Oct 16 2019||Argued. For petitioner: Scott E. Gant, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Shay Dvoretzky, Washington, D. C.; and Jonathan C. Bond, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)|
|Dec 10 2019||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined. Sotomayor, J., filed a concurring opinion. Ginsburg, J., filed an opinion dissenting in part and dissenting from the judgment.|
|Jan 13 2020||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...