|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-847||1st Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2020|
Issue: Whether it violates the First Amendment to designate a labor union to represent and speak for public-sector employees who object to its advocacy on their behalf.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 02 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 5, 2020)|
|Jan 24 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation filed.|
|Jan 30 2020||Waiver of right of respondent Associated Faculties of the University of Maine to respond filed.|
|Jan 31 2020||Waiver of right of respondents University of Maine at Machias, the Board of Trustees of the University of Maine System to respond filed.|
|Jan 31 2020||Waiver of right of respondent State of Maine to respond filed.|
|Feb 04 2020||Brief amicus curiae of National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation filed.|
|Feb 04 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Competitive Enterprise Institute filed.|
|Feb 05 2020||Brief amicus curiae of The Fairness Center filed.|
|Feb 05 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Freedom Foundation.|
|Feb 05 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Liberty Justice Center filed.|
|Feb 05 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Goldwater Institute filed.|
|Feb 05 2020||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Scholars filed.|
|Feb 05 2020||Brief amici curiae of Public Policy Research Organizations and Advocacy Groups filed.|
|Feb 05 2020||Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed.|
|Feb 19 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.|
|Feb 27 2020||Response Requested. (Due March 30, 2020)|
|Mar 05 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 30, 2020 to April 30, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 09 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 30, 2020, for all respondents.|
|Mar 30 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 30, 2020 to June 30, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 01 2020||Letter of respondent Maine received.|
|Apr 01 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including June 30, 2020, for all respondents.|
|Jun 25 2020||Brief of respondent University of Maine at Machias, the Board of Trustees of the University of Maine System in opposition filed.|
|Jun 26 2020||Brief of respondent State of Maine in opposition filed.|
|Jun 29 2020||Brief of respondent Associated Faculties of the University of Maine in opposition filed.|
|Jul 13 2020||Reply of petitioner Jonathan Reisman filed. (Distributed)|
|Jul 15 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.|
|Sep 02 2020||Supplemental brief of petitioner Jonathan Reisman filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 08 2020||Supplemental brief of respondent Associated Faculties of the University of Maine filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 05 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Freedom Foundation GRANTED.|
|Oct 05 2020||Petition DENIED.|
#SCOTUS does not take up 2nd question in the case, on whether to overrule its 2020 decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma. Full order is here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/012122zr_3f14.pdf https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1484606315519516675
#SCOTUS grants one new case, sets it for argument in April: Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, on whether a state has authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country.
More opinions coming on Monday.
#SCOTUS website indicates that the Court is expected to release more opinions on Monday morning at 10 am.
The next #SCOTUS grants? Kevin McCarthy v. Nancy Pelosi in a fight over congressional proxy voting; the First Amendment-based ministerial exception to employment law returns; nondelegation doctrine (!); and the constitutionality of the FTC's structure.
Revenge of the rescheduled cases: Congressional proxy voting, the ministerial exception, and more - SCOTUSblog
The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming con...
JUST IN: The Supreme Court, over dissents from the three liberal justices, rejects a request from Texas abortion clinics to immediately return the litigation over Texas' six-week abortion law to a federal district court.
The Supreme Court issues a single opinion today, ruling in an 8-1 vote that a criminal defendant's rights were violated under the Sixth Amendment's confrontation clause when the government introduced a plea allocution from another proceeding. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-637_10n2.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: We expect one or more opinions in argued cases to be issued starting at 10 a.m. EST. At 9:45, we'll fire up our live blog, where we'll also chat about this week's arguments and last night's ruling on Trump records. Grab your ☕️ & join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, Jan. 20 - SCOTUSblog
On Thursday, January 20, we will be live blogging as the court releases opinions in one or more argued cases f...