|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-847||1st Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2020|
Issue: Whether it violates the First Amendment to designate a labor union to represent and speak for public-sector employees who object to its advocacy on their behalf.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 02 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 5, 2020)|
|Jan 24 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation filed.|
|Jan 30 2020||Waiver of right of respondent Associated Faculties of the University of Maine to respond filed.|
|Jan 31 2020||Waiver of right of respondents University of Maine at Machias, the Board of Trustees of the University of Maine System to respond filed.|
|Jan 31 2020||Waiver of right of respondent State of Maine to respond filed.|
|Feb 04 2020||Brief amicus curiae of National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation filed.|
|Feb 04 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Competitive Enterprise Institute filed.|
|Feb 05 2020||Brief amicus curiae of The Fairness Center filed.|
|Feb 05 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Freedom Foundation.|
|Feb 05 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Liberty Justice Center filed.|
|Feb 05 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Goldwater Institute filed.|
|Feb 05 2020||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Scholars filed.|
|Feb 05 2020||Brief amici curiae of Public Policy Research Organizations and Advocacy Groups filed.|
|Feb 05 2020||Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed.|
|Feb 19 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.|
|Feb 27 2020||Response Requested. (Due March 30, 2020)|
|Mar 05 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 30, 2020 to April 30, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 09 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 30, 2020, for all respondents.|
|Mar 30 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 30, 2020 to June 30, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 01 2020||Letter of respondent Maine received.|
|Apr 01 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including June 30, 2020, for all respondents.|
|Jun 25 2020||Brief of respondent University of Maine at Machias, the Board of Trustees of the University of Maine System in opposition filed.|
|Jun 26 2020||Brief of respondent State of Maine in opposition filed.|
|Jun 29 2020||Brief of respondent Associated Faculties of the University of Maine in opposition filed.|
|Jul 13 2020||Reply of petitioner Jonathan Reisman filed. (Distributed)|
|Jul 15 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.|
|Sep 02 2020||Supplemental brief of petitioner Jonathan Reisman filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 08 2020||Supplemental brief of respondent Associated Faculties of the University of Maine filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 05 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Freedom Foundation GRANTED.|
|Oct 05 2020||Petition DENIED.|
Supreme Court opinions in 15 minutes!
We’re LIVE right now discussing which opinions we could see today and answering your questions. Join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, April 22 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, April 22, as the court releases one or more opinions in argued cases. Th...
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.