|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-847||1st Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2020|
Issue: Whether it violates the First Amendment to designate a labor union to represent and speak for public-sector employees who object to its advocacy on their behalf.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 02 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 5, 2020)|
|Jan 24 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation filed.|
|Jan 30 2020||Waiver of right of respondent Associated Faculties of the University of Maine to respond filed.|
|Jan 31 2020||Waiver of right of respondents University of Maine at Machias, the Board of Trustees of the University of Maine System to respond filed.|
|Jan 31 2020||Waiver of right of respondent State of Maine to respond filed.|
|Feb 04 2020||Brief amicus curiae of National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation filed.|
|Feb 04 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Competitive Enterprise Institute filed.|
|Feb 05 2020||Brief amicus curiae of The Fairness Center filed.|
|Feb 05 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Freedom Foundation.|
|Feb 05 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Liberty Justice Center filed.|
|Feb 05 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Goldwater Institute filed.|
|Feb 05 2020||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Scholars filed.|
|Feb 05 2020||Brief amici curiae of Public Policy Research Organizations and Advocacy Groups filed.|
|Feb 05 2020||Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed.|
|Feb 19 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.|
|Feb 27 2020||Response Requested. (Due March 30, 2020)|
|Mar 05 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 30, 2020 to April 30, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 09 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 30, 2020, for all respondents.|
|Mar 30 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 30, 2020 to June 30, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 01 2020||Letter of respondent Maine received.|
|Apr 01 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including June 30, 2020, for all respondents.|
|Jun 25 2020||Brief of respondent University of Maine at Machias, the Board of Trustees of the University of Maine System in opposition filed.|
|Jun 26 2020||Brief of respondent State of Maine in opposition filed.|
|Jun 29 2020||Brief of respondent Associated Faculties of the University of Maine in opposition filed.|
|Jul 13 2020||Reply of petitioner Jonathan Reisman filed. (Distributed)|
|Jul 15 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.|
|Sep 02 2020||Supplemental brief of petitioner Jonathan Reisman filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 08 2020||Supplemental brief of respondent Associated Faculties of the University of Maine filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 05 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Freedom Foundation GRANTED.|
|Oct 05 2020||Petition DENIED.|
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
I really enjoyed getting to chat with the incomparable @AHoweBlogger about (1) why #SCOTUS's "shadow docket" *is* a big deal; (2) why it's so hard to figure out how to include it in broader assessments of the Justices' work; and (3) some possible ways to include it going forward. https://twitter.com/SCOTUSblog/status/1417545384314949635
How do you solve a problem like the shadow docket? @steve_vladeck has some thoughts and shared them with @AHoweBlogger in the latest SCOTUStalk.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.