|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|13-502||9th Cir.||Jan 12, 2015||Jun 18, 2015||9-0||Thomas||OT 2014|
Holding: The provisions of a municipality’s sign code that impose more stringent restrictions on signs directing the public to the meeting of a non-profit group than on signs conveying other messages are content-based regulations of speech that cannot survive strict scrutiny.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on June 18, 2015. Justice Alito filed a concurring opinion in which Justices Kennedy and Sotomayor joined. Justice Breyer filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Justice Kagan filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Justices Ginsburg and Breyer joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 21 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 20, 2013)|
|Oct 31 2013||Waiver of right of respondents Town of Gilbert, Arizona, et al. to respond filed.|
|Nov 19 2013||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Professors Ashutosh Bhagwat, et al.|
|Nov 26 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 13, 2013.|
|Nov 26 2013||Response Requested . (Due December 26, 2013)|
|Dec 14 2013||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including February 24, 2014.|
|Feb 19 2014||Brief of respondents Town of Gilbert, Arizona, and Adam Adams in opposition filed.|
|Mar 5 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 21, 2014.|
|Mar 5 2014||Reply of petitioners Clyde Reed, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 30 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 30, 2014.|
|Jul 1 2014||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Professors Ashutosh Bhagwat, et al. GRANTED.|
|Jul 1 2014||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jul 9 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.|
|Jul 18 2014||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including September 15, 2014.|
|Aug 1 2014||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including October 31, 2014.|
|Sep 2 2014||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is further extended to and including November 14, 2014.|
|Sep 15 2014||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)|
|Sep 15 2014||Brief of petitioners Clyde Reed, et al. filed.|
|Sep 22 2014||Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed.|
|Sep 22 2014||Brief amicus curiae of General Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists filed.|
|Sep 22 2014||Brief amicus curiae of The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty filed.|
|Sep 22 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Justice and Freedom Fund filed.|
|Sep 22 2014||Brief amici curiae of Christian Legal Society, et al. filed.|
|Sep 22 2014||Brief amici curiae of Robert Wilson, et al. filed.|
|Sep 22 2014||Brief amici curiae of State of West Virginia, et al. filed.|
|Sep 22 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation filed.|
|Sep 22 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Family Research Council filed.|
|Sep 22 2014||Brief amici curiae of Liberty Counsel and National Hispanic Christian Leadership Council filed.|
|Sep 22 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Christian Life Commission of the Missouri Baptist Convention filed.|
|Sep 22 2014||Brief amicus curiae of The American Center for Law and Justice filed.|
|Oct 9 2014||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Nov 14 2014||Brief of respondents Town of Gilbert, Arizona, et al. filed.|
|Nov 21 2014||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, January 12, 2015.|
|Nov 21 2014||Brief amici curiae of National League of Cities, et al., filed.|
|Dec 2 2014||CIRCULATED.|
|Dec 2 2014||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Dec 2 2014||Record received from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit, the record is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Dec 2 2014||Record received from U.S.D.C. District of Arizona, the record is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Dec 15 2014||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Dec 15 2014||Reply of petitioners Clyde Reed, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 12 2015||Argued. For petitioners: David A. Cortman, Lawrenceville, Ga. For United States as amicus curiae: Eric J. Feigin, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Philip W. Savrin, Atlanta, Ga.|
|Mar 3 2015||Letter from counsel for the petitioners filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 18 2015||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Scalia, Kennedy, Alito, and Sotomayor, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Kennedy and Sotomayor, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Kagan, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Ginsburg and Breyer, JJ., joined.|
|Jul 20 2015||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Bill Cosby’s prosecutors asked the Supreme Court to reinstate his conviction today. Quick explainer.
In our latest episode of SCOTUStalk, @shefalil of @19thnews joined us to preview Wednesday's argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health. Shefali explains the current state of abortion access and the case's implications in Mississippi and across America.
Roe, Dobbs, and the current state of abortion access - SCOTUSblog
In advance of Wednesday's oral argument in the momentous abortion case, Shefali Luthra, a gender and health care r...
Update: Without calling for a response or referring the case to the full court, Justice Breyer just rejected last week's challenge from Massachusetts hospital workers who object to the hospital's COVID vaccine mandate.
(Breyer handles emergency requests from Massachusetts.)
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket challenge to a COVID vaccine mandate. This one is from employees at Mass General Brigham who say the Boston-based hospital violated federal law by not granting them exemptions from the hospital's vaccine policy. Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/21A175.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral argument in a case about Medicare payments to hospitals that serve low-income patients. Lots of money at stake, plus potential implications for the Chevron doctrine. @JACoganJr explains the case:
Money for safety-net hospitals at stake in dispute over Medicare payment formula - SCOTUSblog
When it comes to highlighting the complexity of the Medicare Act and its hospital payment rules, Becerra v. Empire...
Two days from now, SCOTUS will hear the biggest abortion case in a generation. In a battle over a Mississippi law, abortion opponents are asking the court to end the constitutional right to abortion. Here's our preview of the case, via @AHoweBlogger.
Roe v. Wade hangs in balance as reshaped court prepares to hear biggest abortion case in decades - SCOTUSblog
When he ran for president in 2016, then-candidate Donald Trump promised to nominate Supreme Court justices who would...
JUST IN: One new cert grant this morning: Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP. More on the case here: https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/berger-v-north-carolina-state-conference-of-the-naacp/
#SCOTUS adds one new case to its merits docket this morning: Berger v. NC Conference of NAACP, in which the justices will weigh in on an effort by Republican legislators in the state to intervene to defend the state’s voter-ID law. Here's the order: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112421zr_7li8.pdf